How Chinese online critics oppose genetically modified foods: discourse analysis and food policy implications

This study examines public discourses of genetically modified foods (GMFs) on Chinese social media WeChat. Through a discourse-historical approach, it focuses on how critics of GMFs discursively construct and legitimate their views against GMFs and explores the ideologies underpinning their distrust. Findings show that opponents employ metaphors, ironies, moralization, and intertextuality to emotionally and morally appeal against GMFs, creating tensions with modern agricultural discourses. The paper reflects on researchers’ stance as critical discourse analysts in analyzing such a significant yet controversial topic and demonstrates the importance of keeping a neutral, yet critical position in revealing the nuances of debates about GMFs. Implications for food policy researchers to address arguments against GMFs are also discussed in this paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04964-z
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Chinese online critics oppose genetically modified foods: discourse analysis and food policy implications

Jinrong Lin, Xuekun Liu
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

How Chinese online critics oppose genetically modified foods: discourse analysis and food policy implications

Jinrong Lin, Xuekun Liu
article en

Abstract

This study examines public discourses of genetically modified foods (GMFs) on Chinese social media WeChat. Through a discourse-historical approach, it focuses on how critics of GMFs discursively construct and legitimate their views against GMFs and explores the ideologies underpinning their distrust. Findings show that opponents employ metaphors, ironies, moralization, and intertextuality to emotionally and morally appeal against GMFs, creating tensions with modern agricultural discourses. The paper reflects on researchers’ stance as critical discourse analysts in analyzing such a significant yet controversial topic and demonstrates the importance of keeping a neutral, yet critical position in revealing the nuances of debates about GMFs. Implications for food policy researchers to address arguments against GMFs are also discussed in this paper.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Jinan University (CN), Central China Normal University (CN), Zhuhai People's Hospital (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.