Experimental Evaluation on Acoustic Emission Wave Propagation of Laminated Composites with Cutouts Using Auto Sensor Testing

Abstract This study investigates Acoustic Emission (AE) wave propagation in large cantilever composite panels using experimental and numerical analysis. Five distinct case studies, considering two distinct scenarios—panels with and without cutouts—were investigated under various boundary conditions and excitations. The boundary conditions and support deviate from prevailing AE studies on flat panels supported by simply supported structures to focus on cantilever support that resembles aeroplane wings. A comparative study on the effectiveness of the Hanning Window Function, Sine, and square wave functions in characterizing wave propagation within laminated composite structures was investigated. Variations of the Hanning window function at frequencies of 100 kHz, 400 kHz, and 55 kHz are examined to assess their impact on stress wave time-of-arrival. Through experimental endeavours and three-dimensional (3D) numerical models, meticulous analyses on stress wave propagation time-of-arrival, frequencies, and excitation waveform were performed. Experiments were conducted using the Auto Sensor Testing (AST) feature for its superior repeatability and data acquisition over conventional methods such as pencil-break and impulse hammer tests. Results from Case I (without cutout) and Case III (with cutout) show that the wave propagation time from trigger sensor 1 to sensor 3 was 78.5 µs for the panel without a cutout and 125.5 µs for the panel with a cutout. This significant time discrepancy underscores the impact of boundary conditions and excitation waveforms on wave propagation in panels with and without cutouts. Comparative analysis affirms specific excitation waveform and frequency suitability, aligning numerical results with experimental observations, thereby substantiating the reliability and accuracy of the proposed numerical methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-025-01192-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Evaluation on Acoustic Emission Wave Propagation of Laminated Composites with Cutouts Using Auto Sensor Testing

Binayak Bhandari, B. Gangadhara Prusty
1 citations
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
0.86
article

Experimental Evaluation on Acoustic Emission Wave Propagation of Laminated Composites with Cutouts Using Auto Sensor Testing

Binayak Bhandari, B. Gangadhara Prusty
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates Acoustic Emission (AE) wave propagation in large cantilever composite panels using experimental and numerical analysis. Five distinct case studies, considering two distinct scenarios—panels with and without cutouts—were investigated under various boundary conditions and excitations. The boundary conditions and support deviate from prevailing AE studies on flat panels supported by simply supported structures to focus on cantilever support that resembles aeroplane wings. A comparative study on the effectiveness of the Hanning Window Function, Sine, and square wave functions in characterizing wave propagation within laminated composite structures was investigated. Variations of the Hanning window function at frequencies of 100 kHz, 400 kHz, and 55 kHz are examined to assess their impact on stress wave time-of-arrival. Through experimental endeavours and three-dimensional (3D) numerical models, meticulous analyses on stress wave propagation time-of-arrival, frequencies, and excitation waveform were performed. Experiments were conducted using the Auto Sensor Testing (AST) feature for its superior repeatability and data acquisition over conventional methods such as pencil-break and impulse hammer tests. Results from Case I (without cutout) and Case III (with cutout) show that the wave propagation time from trigger sensor 1 to sensor 3 was 78.5 µs for the panel without a cutout and 125.5 µs for the panel with a cutout. This significant time discrepancy underscores the impact of boundary conditions and excitation waveforms on wave propagation in panels with and without cutouts. Comparative analysis affirms specific excitation waveform and frequency suitability, aligning numerical results with experimental observations, thereby substantiating the reliability and accuracy of the proposed numerical methodology.

Journal of Nondestructive EvaluationVol. 44(2)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
University of New South Wales
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.