Fuzzy AHP Approach for Enhancing Excavation Support System Selection in Building Projects: Balancing Safety and Cost-Effectiveness

Selecting the appropriate excavation support system (ESS) is critical for ensuring construction projects’ safety and cost-effectiveness. Several dynamic factors influence this decision-making process, such as the groundwater table, excavation depth, proximity to neighboring buildings, and soil characteristics. In practice, the selection often depends heavily on the subjective judgment of experienced professionals in the construction industry. Although the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is frequently employed to evaluate alternatives using multiple criteria, it fails to adequately account for the subjectivity and uncertainty in converting the decision-maker’s intuition into exact numerical values. To overcome this challenge, this study proposes an enhanced method known as fuzzy AHP. This approach is designed to capture the subjective experiences of experts better and effectively incorporate the uncertainties present in the decision-making process, ultimately aiding in identifying the most suitable ESS. A case study of excavation projects is also included to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed model. By presenting this approach, the study aims to raise awareness within the construction industry about the critical factors to consider when selecting the best excavation support technique for specific projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091580
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fuzzy AHP Approach for Enhancing Excavation Support System Selection in Building Projects: Balancing Safety and Cost-Effectiveness

Mohammed K. Alkharisi, Emad Elbeltagi, Mansour Alturki, Hossam Wefki et al.
1 citations
Buildings
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

Fuzzy AHP Approach for Enhancing Excavation Support System Selection in Building Projects: Balancing Safety and Cost-Effectiveness

Mohammed K. Alkharisi, Emad Elbeltagi, Mansour Alturki, Hossam Wefki, Mohamed T. Elnabwy, Ahmed Elgamal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate excavation support system (ESS) is critical for ensuring construction projects’ safety and cost-effectiveness. Several dynamic factors influence this decision-making process, such as the groundwater table, excavation depth, proximity to neighboring buildings, and soil characteristics. In practice, the selection often depends heavily on the subjective judgment of experienced professionals in the construction industry. Although the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is frequently employed to evaluate alternatives using multiple criteria, it fails to adequately account for the subjectivity and uncertainty in converting the decision-maker’s intuition into exact numerical values. To overcome this challenge, this study proposes an enhanced method known as fuzzy AHP. This approach is designed to capture the subjective experiences of experts better and effectively incorporate the uncertainties present in the decision-making process, ultimately aiding in identifying the most suitable ESS. A case study of excavation projects is also included to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed model. By presenting this approach, the study aims to raise awareness within the construction industry about the critical factors to consider when selecting the best excavation support technique for specific projects.

BuildingsVol. 15(9)
Damietta University (EG), Qassim University (SA), Mansoura University (EG), National Water Research Center (EG), Port Said University (EG)
Qassim University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.