Comparison of the Methods for Predicting the Critical Temperature and Critical Pressure of Petroleum Fractions and Individual Hydrocarbons

All modern process simulators rely on thermodynamic methods to estimate physical properties and calculate phase equilibria. The critical properties of individual components or pseudo-components, which represent undefined mixtures, play a crucial role in these calculations. However, the chemical compositions and characteristics of whole crude oils, petroleum fractions, and fuels, which are very complex mixtures of individual hydrocarbons, can vary significantly depending on the specific crude oil and the processing involved. For instance, straight-run petroleum fractions differ from those obtained through cracking processes due to differences in unsaturated hydrocarbon content. Consequently, effective methods for predicting critical temperature and pressure must account for a wide range of compositional scenarios. To address this challenge, we utilized a database of 176 individual hydrocarbons to evaluate the existing correlations for critical temperature and pressure calculations. Intercriteria analysis was performed to evaluate the relations between the different variables to be used for critical temperature and pressure predictions. Additionally, we proposed new correlations and ANN models for these properties and assessed their performance. Our study aims to provide robust predictive models that can accurately estimate critical properties across diverse petroleum fractions and compositions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuels
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6020036
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Methods for Predicting the Critical Temperature and Critical Pressure of Petroleum Fractions and Individual Hydrocarbons

Svetlin Vasilev, Ivelina Shishkova, Vania Georgieva, Veselina Bureva et al.
1 citations
Fuels
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
0.67
article

Comparison of the Methods for Predicting the Critical Temperature and Critical Pressure of Petroleum Fractions and Individual Hydrocarbons

Svetlin Vasilev, Ivelina Shishkova, Vania Georgieva, Veselina Bureva, Sotir Sotirov, Dicho Stratiev, Evdokia Sotirova, Krassimir Atanassov, Radoslava Nikolova, Anife Veli, Svetoslav Nenov, Denis D. Stratiev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

All modern process simulators rely on thermodynamic methods to estimate physical properties and calculate phase equilibria. The critical properties of individual components or pseudo-components, which represent undefined mixtures, play a crucial role in these calculations. However, the chemical compositions and characteristics of whole crude oils, petroleum fractions, and fuels, which are very complex mixtures of individual hydrocarbons, can vary significantly depending on the specific crude oil and the processing involved. For instance, straight-run petroleum fractions differ from those obtained through cracking processes due to differences in unsaturated hydrocarbon content. Consequently, effective methods for predicting critical temperature and pressure must account for a wide range of compositional scenarios. To address this challenge, we utilized a database of 176 individual hydrocarbons to evaluate the existing correlations for critical temperature and pressure calculations. Intercriteria analysis was performed to evaluate the relations between the different variables to be used for critical temperature and pressure predictions. Additionally, we proposed new correlations and ANN models for these properties and assessed their performance. Our study aims to provide robust predictive models that can accurately estimate critical properties across diverse petroleum fractions and compositions.

FuelsVol. 6(2)
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG), Burgas Free University (BG), Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering (BG), Prof. Assen Zlatarov University (BG), University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy (BG)
Università degli Studi di Teramo
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.