Cardio-Oncology Challenges in Elderly Patients

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Along with the ageing of the population, cancer and cardiovascular (CV) diseases more frequently coexist, complicating patients' management. Here, we focus on elderly oncologic patients, describing clinical features and comorbidities, discussing therapeutic management CV risk factors and CV complications risen during our CV follow-up, and exploring the different items of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and the correlation between cardiac function by means of standard 2D echocardiography and each of the CGA items. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 108 consecutive patients (mean age 73.55 ± 5.43 years old; 40.7% females) referred to our cardio-oncology unit were enrolled, and three different groups were identified: Group 1, patients naïve for oncologic treatments (mean age 73.32 ± 5.40; 33% females); Group 2, patients already on antineoplastic protocols (mean age 73.46 ± 5.09; 44.1% females); and Group 3, patients who had already completed cancer treatments (mean age 74.34 ± 6.23; 55% female). The correlation between CGA, performed in a subgroup of 62 patients (57.4%), and echocardiographic parameters was assessed. <b>Results:</b> Group 2 patients had the highest incidence of CV events (CVEs) (61.8% vs. 14.8% in Group 1, 15% in Group 3; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001) and withdrawals from oncologic treatments (8.8% vs. none in Group 1; <i>p</i> = 0.035). Group 2 had worse 48-month survival (47.1% vs. 22.2% in Group 1, 20% in Group 3; <i>p</i> = 0.05), which was even more evident when focusing on patients who died during follow-up. When assessing echocardiographic parameters, physical activity showed an inverse correlation with the left ventricular mass index (<i>p</i> = 0.034), while the Frailty index showed a direct correlation with the E/e' ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.005). <b>Conclusions:</b> A thorough baseline CV assessment is important in elderly oncologic patients eligible for anticancer treatment. In this population, CGA can be a simple, feasible screening tool that might help identify patients at a greater risk of developing CVEs correlating to several pivotal cardiovascular parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093257
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardio-Oncology Challenges in Elderly Patients

Stefania Napolitano, Giuseppe Rengo, Floriana Morgillo, Giovanni Esposito et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Frailty in Older Adults
4.90
article

Cardio-Oncology Challenges in Elderly Patients

Stefania Napolitano, Giuseppe Rengo, Floriana Morgillo, Giovanni Esposito, Guido Iaccarino, Teresa Troiani, Grazia Arpino, Francesco Fiore, Roberto Bianco, Umberto Attanasio, Francesco Curcio, Luigi Formisano, Carminia M. Della Corte, Veronica Flocco, Marco Picardi, Pasquale Abete, Carlo G. Tocchetti, Valentina Mercurio, Chiara Carlomagno, Giulia Martini, Alessandra Cuomo, Francesco Elia, Ester Topa, Martina Iengo, Antonio Cittadini, Marika Rizza, Mario Giuliano, Eliana De Rosa, Maria Cristina Luise, Erika Martinelli
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Along with the ageing of the population, cancer and cardiovascular (CV) diseases more frequently coexist, complicating patients' management. Here, we focus on elderly oncologic patients, describing clinical features and comorbidities, discussing therapeutic management CV risk factors and CV complications risen during our CV follow-up, and exploring the different items of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and the correlation between cardiac function by means of standard 2D echocardiography and each of the CGA items. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 108 consecutive patients (mean age 73.55 ± 5.43 years old; 40.7% females) referred to our cardio-oncology unit were enrolled, and three different groups were identified: Group 1, patients naïve for oncologic treatments (mean age 73.32 ± 5.40; 33% females); Group 2, patients already on antineoplastic protocols (mean age 73.46 ± 5.09; 44.1% females); and Group 3, patients who had already completed cancer treatments (mean age 74.34 ± 6.23; 55% female). The correlation between CGA, performed in a subgroup of 62 patients (57.4%), and echocardiographic parameters was assessed. <b>Results:</b> Group 2 patients had the highest incidence of CV events (CVEs) (61.8% vs. 14.8% in Group 1, 15% in Group 3; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001) and withdrawals from oncologic treatments (8.8% vs. none in Group 1; <i>p</i> = 0.035). Group 2 had worse 48-month survival (47.1% vs. 22.2% in Group 1, 20% in Group 3; <i>p</i> = 0.05), which was even more evident when focusing on patients who died during follow-up. When assessing echocardiographic parameters, physical activity showed an inverse correlation with the left ventricular mass index (<i>p</i> = 0.034), while the Frailty index showed a direct correlation with the E/e' ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.005). <b>Conclusions:</b> A thorough baseline CV assessment is important in elderly oncologic patients eligible for anticancer treatment. In this population, CGA can be a simple, feasible screening tool that might help identify patients at a greater risk of developing CVEs correlating to several pivotal cardiovascular parameters.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Frailty in Older Adults
4.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.