Can advanced clinical practitioners autonomously manage lower limb deep vein thrombosis? A clinical audit

Background: This audit evaluates the compliance of advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) in managing lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in an ambulatory emergency care (AEC) clinic of an NHS trust. Compliance was measured against national standards set by NICE. Aim: To review whether ACPs can independently manage patients without the need for a second review by a consultant. Methods: Data for 12 months (from 2021–2022) were reviewed for patients with DVT to assess the timing of ACP clerking and consultant review. Audit standards were established, focussing on the following criteria: Wells score documentation, D-dimer results, anticoagulation prescribing, and ultrasound and blood test requests. Findings: A total of 48 patients waited an average of 2 hours and 37 minutes between ACP and consultant review. Wells scores were documented in 56% of cases and 97% of the patients who needed a D-dimer test had one available. ACPs prescribed appropriate anticoagulation in 100% of cases and ultrasound imaging was requested in all cases. Baseline blood tests were requested in 98% of cases. Conclusions: ACPs were compliant in 4/5 standards at >95%. This audit identified significant time savings and patient and clinician satisfaction was achieved through autonomous ACP practice. Implications for practice: There is scope for improved autonomy of ACPs and the potential for improved patient flow, reduced workload for consultant physicians and enhanced patient experience as a result.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Advancing Practice
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/ijap.2023.0051
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can advanced clinical practitioners autonomously manage lower limb deep vein thrombosis? A clinical audit

Shane Kailla
International Journal for Advancing Practice
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Can advanced clinical practitioners autonomously manage lower limb deep vein thrombosis? A clinical audit

Shane Kailla
article en

Abstract

Background: This audit evaluates the compliance of advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) in managing lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in an ambulatory emergency care (AEC) clinic of an NHS trust. Compliance was measured against national standards set by NICE. Aim: To review whether ACPs can independently manage patients without the need for a second review by a consultant. Methods: Data for 12 months (from 2021–2022) were reviewed for patients with DVT to assess the timing of ACP clerking and consultant review. Audit standards were established, focussing on the following criteria: Wells score documentation, D-dimer results, anticoagulation prescribing, and ultrasound and blood test requests. Findings: A total of 48 patients waited an average of 2 hours and 37 minutes between ACP and consultant review. Wells scores were documented in 56% of cases and 97% of the patients who needed a D-dimer test had one available. ACPs prescribed appropriate anticoagulation in 100% of cases and ultrasound imaging was requested in all cases. Baseline blood tests were requested in 98% of cases. Conclusions: ACPs were compliant in 4/5 standards at >95%. This audit identified significant time savings and patient and clinician satisfaction was achieved through autonomous ACP practice. Implications for practice: There is scope for improved autonomy of ACPs and the potential for improved patient flow, reduced workload for consultant physicians and enhanced patient experience as a result.

International Journal for Advancing PracticeVol. 3(2)
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.