Comparison of soot combustion dynamics in the catalytic diesel particulate filters and non-catalytic diesel particulate filters

In the curent study, we delve into the impact of catalyst usage on the regeneration process of wall-flow diesel particulate filters (DPFs) by utilizing a two-dimensional mathematical model of soot combustion. The catalytic DPF reaches a higher peak regeneration temperature and achieves this peak earlier than the non-catalytic DPF. The temperature distribution differences between the non-catalytic DPF and the catalytic DPF are most pronounced from 80 to 200 seconds. The soot retention in the non-catalytic DPF decreases slowly, almost linearly, and by 600 seconds, the soot conversion rate is still less than 50%. In contrast, for the catalytic DPF, it takes only 200 seconds to combust 80% of the soot. For both the non-catalytic DPF and the catalytic DPF, there is no occurrence of a combustion front propagation, indicating that both operate under the mechanism of mild regeneration mode.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3060579
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of soot combustion dynamics in the catalytic diesel particulate filters and non-catalytic diesel particulate filters

Wentao Cui, Zunmin Li, Jiangtao Bi, Hongbo Liu et al.
3 links
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
article

Comparison of soot combustion dynamics in the catalytic diesel particulate filters and non-catalytic diesel particulate filters

Wentao Cui, Zunmin Li, Jiangtao Bi, Hongbo Liu, Haijun Yang, Mengmeng Yu, Gang Zhong
article en

Abstract

In the curent study, we delve into the impact of catalyst usage on the regeneration process of wall-flow diesel particulate filters (DPFs) by utilizing a two-dimensional mathematical model of soot combustion. The catalytic DPF reaches a higher peak regeneration temperature and achieves this peak earlier than the non-catalytic DPF. The temperature distribution differences between the non-catalytic DPF and the catalytic DPF are most pronounced from 80 to 200 seconds. The soot retention in the non-catalytic DPF decreases slowly, almost linearly, and by 600 seconds, the soot conversion rate is still less than 50%. In contrast, for the catalytic DPF, it takes only 200 seconds to combust 80% of the soot. For both the non-catalytic DPF and the catalytic DPF, there is no occurrence of a combustion front propagation, indicating that both operate under the mechanism of mild regeneration mode.

Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.