No hard feelings? The effects of competition on vote transfers in two-round elections

Abstract Runoff elections are a useful method for solving coordination problems in majoritarian electoral systems based on single-member districts in that they provide a formal mechanism for ideologically similar parties to coordinate on a single candidate. The mechanism is, however, not free of problems as it places ideological neighbors in competition with one another on the first ballot. The temptation to campaign against the members of one’s own bloc carries risk, as it may reduce the willingness of the supporters of the losing party on the first ballot to cast their vote for the party that will represent its ideological bloc on the second ballot. We revisit and extend Tsebelis’ (Br J Polit Sci 18(2):145–70, 1988a) work on the conditions under which parties are able to curb their incentives to engage in intra-bloc campaigning by deriving additional testable hypotheses and expanding the analysis temporally to include elections from 1958 to 2012.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
French Politics
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-025-00277-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No hard feelings? The effects of competition on vote transfers in two-round elections

Indridi Indridason, Nicholas T. Willis
1 citations
French Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
article

No hard feelings? The effects of competition on vote transfers in two-round elections

Indridi Indridason, Nicholas T. Willis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Runoff elections are a useful method for solving coordination problems in majoritarian electoral systems based on single-member districts in that they provide a formal mechanism for ideologically similar parties to coordinate on a single candidate. The mechanism is, however, not free of problems as it places ideological neighbors in competition with one another on the first ballot. The temptation to campaign against the members of one’s own bloc carries risk, as it may reduce the willingness of the supporters of the losing party on the first ballot to cast their vote for the party that will represent its ideological bloc on the second ballot. We revisit and extend Tsebelis’ (Br J Polit Sci 18(2):145–70, 1988a) work on the conditions under which parties are able to curb their incentives to engage in intra-bloc campaigning by deriving additional testable hypotheses and expanding the analysis temporally to include elections from 1958 to 2012.

French PoliticsVol. 23(2)
University of California, Riverside (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No hard feelings? The effects of competition on vote transfers in two-round elections — Indridi Indridason, Nicholas T. Willis · French Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS