The Role of Protocol Papers, Scoping Reviews, and Systematic Reviews in Responsible AI Research

Research protocol papers, scoping reviews, and systematic reviews are important tools for ensuring transparency, methodological rigor, accountability, and reproducibility in scholarly research. While widely adopted in disciplines such as medicine and social sciences, these practices remain underutilized in computer science and engineering, particularly within responsible AI research. This article explores the critical role that scoping and systematic reviews play in synthesizing knowledge, identifying gaps, and guiding future research in responsible AI. It also examines how research protocol papers-especially those developed for structured reviews-can improve the credibility, clarity, and replicability of responsible AI studies. By outlining the benefits and challenges of these methods, we argue for their greater adoption in AI ethics and responsible AI research. We conclude with recommendations to support the institutional, editorial, and cultural shifts necessary to integrate these rigorous methodological tools into responsible AI scholarship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2025.3558666
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Protocol Papers, Scoping Reviews, and Systematic Reviews in Responsible AI Research

Zack Marshall, Ebrahim Bagheri, Calvin Hillis
1 citations
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.52
article

The Role of Protocol Papers, Scoping Reviews, and Systematic Reviews in Responsible AI Research

Zack Marshall, Ebrahim Bagheri, Calvin Hillis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research protocol papers, scoping reviews, and systematic reviews are important tools for ensuring transparency, methodological rigor, accountability, and reproducibility in scholarly research. While widely adopted in disciplines such as medicine and social sciences, these practices remain underutilized in computer science and engineering, particularly within responsible AI research. This article explores the critical role that scoping and systematic reviews play in synthesizing knowledge, identifying gaps, and guiding future research in responsible AI. It also examines how research protocol papers-especially those developed for structured reviews-can improve the credibility, clarity, and replicability of responsible AI studies. By outlining the benefits and challenges of these methods, we argue for their greater adoption in AI ethics and responsible AI research. We conclude with recommendations to support the institutional, editorial, and cultural shifts necessary to integrate these rigorous methodological tools into responsible AI scholarship.

IEEE Technology and Society MagazineVol. 44(2)
University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Protocol Papers, Scoping Reviews, and Systematic Reviews in Responsible AI Research — Zack Marshall, Ebrahim Bagheri, et al. · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS