Clinical value of CA125, AFP, and CEA for combined diagnosis and assessment of gastric cancer prognosis

To analyze the diagnostic and prognostic value of combined detection of CA125, AFP, and CEA for gastric cancer. Ninety-eight gastric cancer patients treated in our hospital from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively selected and classified into the gastric cancer group according to screening criteria, while 80 patients diagnosed with benign gastric lesions during the same period were classified into the benign group. Serum levels of CA125, AFP, CEA, and their positive rates were significantly higher in the gastric cancer group compared to the benign group (P<0.05). The AUCs for CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in diagnosing gastric cancer were 0.815, 0.813, 0.911, and 0.919, respectively (P<0.001). In patients with stage III-IV, the levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA were higher than those in stage I-II (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in TNM staging of gastric cancer were 0.751, 0.834, 0.911, and 0.931, respectively (P<0.001). Poorly differentiated patients had higher levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA compared to moderately to well-differentiated patients (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in diagnosing differentiation degree were 0.819, 0.883, 0.746, and 0.986, respectively (P<0.001). Patients with metastasis had higher levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA compared to those without metastasis (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in diagnosing metastasis were 0.716, 0.825, 0.863, and 0.892, respectively (P<0.001). The levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA of patients in the death group were higher than those in the survival group (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in predicting clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients were 0.713, 0.809, 0.922, and 0.926, respectively (P<0.001). Cox regression analysis indicated that TNM staging, peritoneal metastasis, and elevated CEA levels were independent risk factors for poor prognosis (mortality) in patients with gastric cancer (P<0.05). Serum levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA in patients with gastric cancer were significantly elevated and were correlated with the degree of differentiation and TNM staging. Combined detection had diagnostic efficacy in assessing metastasis and clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1530522
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical value of CA125, AFP, and CEA for combined diagnosis and assessment of gastric cancer prognosis

Haiying Li, Min Sun, Yuchen Jia, Yajuan Wang et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
6.07
article

Clinical value of CA125, AFP, and CEA for combined diagnosis and assessment of gastric cancer prognosis

Haiying Li, Min Sun, Yuchen Jia, Yajuan Wang, Yamei Yang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

To analyze the diagnostic and prognostic value of combined detection of CA125, AFP, and CEA for gastric cancer. Ninety-eight gastric cancer patients treated in our hospital from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively selected and classified into the gastric cancer group according to screening criteria, while 80 patients diagnosed with benign gastric lesions during the same period were classified into the benign group. Serum levels of CA125, AFP, CEA, and their positive rates were significantly higher in the gastric cancer group compared to the benign group (P<0.05). The AUCs for CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in diagnosing gastric cancer were 0.815, 0.813, 0.911, and 0.919, respectively (P<0.001). In patients with stage III-IV, the levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA were higher than those in stage I-II (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in TNM staging of gastric cancer were 0.751, 0.834, 0.911, and 0.931, respectively (P<0.001). Poorly differentiated patients had higher levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA compared to moderately to well-differentiated patients (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in diagnosing differentiation degree were 0.819, 0.883, 0.746, and 0.986, respectively (P<0.001). Patients with metastasis had higher levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA compared to those without metastasis (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in diagnosing metastasis were 0.716, 0.825, 0.863, and 0.892, respectively (P<0.001). The levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA of patients in the death group were higher than those in the survival group (P<0.05). The AUCs for serum CA125, AFP, CEA, and their combined detection in predicting clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients were 0.713, 0.809, 0.922, and 0.926, respectively (P<0.001). Cox regression analysis indicated that TNM staging, peritoneal metastasis, and elevated CEA levels were independent risk factors for poor prognosis (mortality) in patients with gastric cancer (P<0.05). Serum levels of CA125, AFP, and CEA in patients with gastric cancer were significantly elevated and were correlated with the degree of differentiation and TNM staging. Combined detection had diagnostic efficacy in assessing metastasis and clinical outcomes.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 15
Baoji City Central Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.