Impact of Product Size and Subsequent Consumer Freezing Practices on Meat Quality and Palatability of Different Beef Muscles

The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of product sizes and subsequent consumer freezing practices on beef quality and palatability. Paired beef strip loins (LL), top sirloins (GM), and eye of rounds (ST) from 15 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Low Choice beef carcasses were collected, and each side was assigned into 2 freezing sizes, section (SEC) or steak (STK). Each muscle was also cut into 3 equal portions and randomly assigned to one of the 3 freezer types: blast freezer (BLS), chest freezer (CST), or refrigerator freezer (FRI). Portions assigned to STK were further cut into steaks (2.54 cm). Samples were vacuum sealed and frozen for the first 35-d freezing cycle in a −20°C BLS, then thawed until the internal temperature reached 2°C. After thawing, samples were subjected to a second 35-d freezing cycle based on the assigned freezer types and thawed using the previous method. Samples were then subjected to quality and palatability analyses, with SEC samples fabricated into 2.54-cm steaks before analysis. Product size affected the pH of all muscles, showing SEC had a lower pH than STK (P < 0.05) in LL and GM, while the inverse was observed in ST. The ST muscle pH was influenced by the freezer, with FRI having the highest pH (P < 0.05). No clear pattern was observed in water-holding capacity, although SEC freezing generally had greater purge loss compared with STK. Regardless of muscles, SEC freezing significantly improved color quality and stability compared with STK samples, showing greater redness and lower discoloration (P < 0.05). The consumer sensory panel found minimal differences in palatability quality and acceptability in LL and ST treatments (P > 0.05), whereas SEC-FRI rated lower in tenderness and overall acceptability in GM (P < 0.05). The current results suggest that product size has a greater impact on determining final frozen meat quality compared with freezer types.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meat and Muscle Biology
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.19030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Product Size and Subsequent Consumer Freezing Practices on Meat Quality and Palatability of Different Beef Muscles

1 citations
Meat and Muscle Biology
Library Science and Information Systems
3.25
article

Impact of Product Size and Subsequent Consumer Freezing Practices on Meat Quality and Palatability of Different Beef Muscles

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of product sizes and subsequent consumer freezing practices on beef quality and palatability. Paired beef strip loins (LL), top sirloins (GM), and eye of rounds (ST) from 15 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Low Choice beef carcasses were collected, and each side was assigned into 2 freezing sizes, section (SEC) or steak (STK). Each muscle was also cut into 3 equal portions and randomly assigned to one of the 3 freezer types: blast freezer (BLS), chest freezer (CST), or refrigerator freezer (FRI). Portions assigned to STK were further cut into steaks (2.54 cm). Samples were vacuum sealed and frozen for the first 35-d freezing cycle in a −20°C BLS, then thawed until the internal temperature reached 2°C. After thawing, samples were subjected to a second 35-d freezing cycle based on the assigned freezer types and thawed using the previous method. Samples were then subjected to quality and palatability analyses, with SEC samples fabricated into 2.54-cm steaks before analysis. Product size affected the pH of all muscles, showing SEC had a lower pH than STK (P < 0.05) in LL and GM, while the inverse was observed in ST. The ST muscle pH was influenced by the freezer, with FRI having the highest pH (P < 0.05). No clear pattern was observed in water-holding capacity, although SEC freezing generally had greater purge loss compared with STK. Regardless of muscles, SEC freezing significantly improved color quality and stability compared with STK samples, showing greater redness and lower discoloration (P < 0.05). The consumer sensory panel found minimal differences in palatability quality and acceptability in LL and ST treatments (P > 0.05), whereas SEC-FRI rated lower in tenderness and overall acceptability in GM (P < 0.05). The current results suggest that product size has a greater impact on determining final frozen meat quality compared with freezer types.

Meat and Muscle BiologyVol. 9(1)
Texas Tech University (US), University of Arkansas System (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Library Science and Information Systems
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.