A Korean Case Study of OTT Platforms Based on Hesmondhalgh and Baker’s Theoretical Framework

The rapid expansion of streaming platforms and OTT services is fundamentally reshaping traditional film production practices. This study draws on in-depth interviews with film producers and outsourced martial arts directors, who have worked on both Netflix originals and commercial films, as well as on prior research, to examine how Netflix’s production system influences the economic, institutional, and administrative landscape of Korean film production labor—and its effect on creative autonomy and identity. Applying the “good work” versus “bad work” framework proposed by Hesmondhalgh and Baker, the analysis reveals both positive and negative facets. On the positive side, long-term contracts, global exposure, and considerable creative freedom for key creators have been observed. Conversely, issues such as burdensome production reporting, frequent meetings with headquarters, and inadequate insurance systems intended to reduce costs present challenges. Remarkably, the study also finds that for lower-tier production staff, the working conditions in both traditional commercial films and Netflix projects are largely indistinguishable, suggesting that conventional practices persist within certain outsourced sectors. Overall, the results indicate that Korean Netflix original productions generally meet the criteria for “good work” in terms of their final outcomes and social contributions. However, they also underscore the urgent need for policy measures aimed at streamlining administrative processes and enhancing labor protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1576
Primary Topic
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Korean Case Study of OTT Platforms Based on Hesmondhalgh and Baker’s Theoretical Framework

Kyuha Ryoo
Journal of Posthumanism
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
article

A Korean Case Study of OTT Platforms Based on Hesmondhalgh and Baker’s Theoretical Framework

Kyuha Ryoo
article en

Abstract

The rapid expansion of streaming platforms and OTT services is fundamentally reshaping traditional film production practices. This study draws on in-depth interviews with film producers and outsourced martial arts directors, who have worked on both Netflix originals and commercial films, as well as on prior research, to examine how Netflix’s production system influences the economic, institutional, and administrative landscape of Korean film production labor—and its effect on creative autonomy and identity. Applying the “good work” versus “bad work” framework proposed by Hesmondhalgh and Baker, the analysis reveals both positive and negative facets. On the positive side, long-term contracts, global exposure, and considerable creative freedom for key creators have been observed. Conversely, issues such as burdensome production reporting, frequent meetings with headquarters, and inadequate insurance systems intended to reduce costs present challenges. Remarkably, the study also finds that for lower-tier production staff, the working conditions in both traditional commercial films and Netflix projects are largely indistinguishable, suggesting that conventional practices persist within certain outsourced sectors. Overall, the results indicate that Korean Netflix original productions generally meet the criteria for “good work” in terms of their final outcomes and social contributions. However, they also underscore the urgent need for policy measures aimed at streamlining administrative processes and enhancing labor protection.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(5)
Joongbu University (KR)
Joongbu University
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.