Research of Improving the Service Quality of Home-Care Long-Term Care Institutions

The research aims to analyze the empirical data of the evaluation results from home-care long-term care (LTC) service institutions to understand the status of home-care institutions in Taiwan. Based on the results of analysis will be used as an empirical study to revise the evaluation benchmark in 2026. Based on the on-site evaluation results of 50 home-based LTC institutions, 26% excellent (evaluation score ≧ 85), and 14% un-qualified (evaluation score < 70). The results were based on the "coincidence rate to be improved" as the key failure factors (KFF) of home-based LTC institutions. Compared with the consensus benchmark of each concept, KFF accounted for 60% of the professional care quality concept, indicating that the professional care quality profile had a significant impact on the evaluation results of home-based LTC institutions. Suggested that home-care institutions integrate cross-disciplinary resource differences based on self-improvement and case-based in response to the evaluation preparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1564
Primary Topic
Medical Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research of Improving the Service Quality of Home-Care Long-Term Care Institutions

Jui-Ying Hung
Journal of Posthumanism
Medical Research and Treatments
article

Research of Improving the Service Quality of Home-Care Long-Term Care Institutions

Jui-Ying Hung
article en

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the empirical data of the evaluation results from home-care long-term care (LTC) service institutions to understand the status of home-care institutions in Taiwan. Based on the results of analysis will be used as an empirical study to revise the evaluation benchmark in 2026. Based on the on-site evaluation results of 50 home-based LTC institutions, 26% excellent (evaluation score ≧ 85), and 14% un-qualified (evaluation score < 70). The results were based on the "coincidence rate to be improved" as the key failure factors (KFF) of home-based LTC institutions. Compared with the consensus benchmark of each concept, KFF accounted for 60% of the professional care quality concept, indicating that the professional care quality profile had a significant impact on the evaluation results of home-based LTC institutions. Suggested that home-care institutions integrate cross-disciplinary resource differences based on self-improvement and case-based in response to the evaluation preparation.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(5)
Chaoyang University of Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Medical Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research of Improving the Service Quality of Home-Care Long-Term Care Institutions — Jui-Ying Hung · Journal of Posthumanism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS