The good old days? Mental health across birth cohorts

Abstract The share of young Australians reporting poor mental health has risen sharply over the past two decades, a pattern mirrored across many high-income countries. A central question is whether this reflects a genuine deterioration in underlying mental health or shifts in how different birth cohorts report their symptoms. Using 22 years of nationally representative longitudinal survey data from Australia (2002–2023), we construct a predicted mental health index from respondents’ socioeconomic characteristics, childhood conditions, physical health, life events, and financial circumstances, and compare it against self-reported mental health to isolate cohort-specific reporting differences. We find that the answer is both, namely, that younger cohorts apply lower thresholds when reporting distress, reflecting greater willingness to acknowledge poor mental health, and underlying mental health has genuinely deteriorated among recent cohorts, particularly females. Adjusting for cohort-specific reporting thresholds flattens the apparent rise in poor mental health, though a deterioration remains. After adjustment, the age gradient steepens, revealing that poor mental health peaks in mid-life, a life-cycle pattern that is obscured in raw self-reports. Our findings underscore the importance of accounting for reporting heterogeneity when interpreting mental health trends and planning health services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Population Economics
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-026-01201-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Birth, Development, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The good old days? Mental health across birth cohorts

William Whittaker, Luke B. Connelly, Sabrina Lenzen
1 citations
Journal of Population Economics
Birth, Development, and Health
article

The good old days? Mental health across birth cohorts

William Whittaker, Luke B. Connelly, Sabrina Lenzen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The share of young Australians reporting poor mental health has risen sharply over the past two decades, a pattern mirrored across many high-income countries. A central question is whether this reflects a genuine deterioration in underlying mental health or shifts in how different birth cohorts report their symptoms. Using 22 years of nationally representative longitudinal survey data from Australia (2002–2023), we construct a predicted mental health index from respondents’ socioeconomic characteristics, childhood conditions, physical health, life events, and financial circumstances, and compare it against self-reported mental health to isolate cohort-specific reporting differences. We find that the answer is both, namely, that younger cohorts apply lower thresholds when reporting distress, reflecting greater willingness to acknowledge poor mental health, and underlying mental health has genuinely deteriorated among recent cohorts, particularly females. Adjusting for cohort-specific reporting thresholds flattens the apparent rise in poor mental health, though a deterioration remains. After adjustment, the age gradient steepens, revealing that poor mental health peaks in mid-life, a life-cycle pattern that is obscured in raw self-reports. Our findings underscore the importance of accounting for reporting heterogeneity when interpreting mental health trends and planning health services.

Journal of Population EconomicsVol. 39(4)
University of Liverpool (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Bologna (IT)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Birth, Development, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.