Flexible suction ureteral access sheaths vs. sheathless RIRS for renal and proximal ureteral stones: a comparative study

FANS-assisted RIRS demonstrated superior immediate stone clearance compared to sheathless RIRS, which may be particularly advantageous for managing complex or infected stones, where complete initial clearance is clinically paramount. In addition, the significantly shorter stenting duration with FANS offers distinct benefits for stent-intolerant patients. While both techniques achieved similar 1-month stone-free rates, these advantages position FANS as a valuable option for selected patients based on stone characteristics and individual clinical priorities. Further studies should explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Urology and Nephrology
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04565-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexible suction ureteral access sheaths vs. sheathless RIRS for renal and proximal ureteral stones: a comparative study

Qiang Liu, Ting Zeng, Shuxia Zhu
3 citations
International Urology and Nephrology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
4.56
article

Flexible suction ureteral access sheaths vs. sheathless RIRS for renal and proximal ureteral stones: a comparative study

Qiang Liu, Ting Zeng, Shuxia Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

FANS-assisted RIRS demonstrated superior immediate stone clearance compared to sheathless RIRS, which may be particularly advantageous for managing complex or infected stones, where complete initial clearance is clinically paramount. In addition, the significantly shorter stenting duration with FANS offers distinct benefits for stent-intolerant patients. While both techniques achieved similar 1-month stone-free rates, these advantages position FANS as a valuable option for selected patients based on stone characteristics and individual clinical priorities. Further studies should explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

International Urology and NephrologyVol. 57(12)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Chengdu Second People's Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.