The Effects of Prescribed Fire on Artificial Wild Turkey Nest Survival in Closed‐Canopy Mixed Hardwood Forest

The eastern wild turkey (<i>Meleagris gallopavo</i>) is an economically and culturally important upland game bird that has recently declined in abundance across portions of the Southeast. Prescribed fire can be used to improve vegetation conditions for wild turkey nesting and brooding, but there are concerns that the application of large-scale prescribed fire can directly or indirectly impact turkey nest success. Therefore, there is a need to improve understanding of the effects of large-scale burns on turkey reproduction, particularly how fire effects on vegetation might affect nest success rates. We implemented an artificial nest study on the Talladega National Forest in northeast Alabama, where prescribed fire is implemented across ≤ 8000 ha annually in large (> 300 ha) burn units. We monitored a total of 230 artificial turkey nests during April-May 2019 and 2020. Nests were systematically distributed throughout the study area at a density of 1 nest/202 ha in areas burned 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-10 years prior to ensure proportional representation of time since fire. The overall artificial nest predation rate was 25%. Top predators included gray foxes (<i>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</i>; 10 nests), opossums (<i>Didelphis virginiana</i>; 9 nests), and coyotes (<i>Canis latrans</i>; 7 nests). We did not detect a relationship between time since fire (<i>p</i> > 0.05) or vegetation measurements (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and artificial nest predation. We believe the patterns we observed were explained by high overstory canopy cover (~90%) across the study area that limited vegetation response to fire. By mediating the potential effects of fire on understory vegetation structure, overstory canopy cover influences the degree to which fire alters concealment cover for nesting hens. Additional research is needed to determine whether large-scale prescribed fire directly or indirectly affects wild turkey nest success in systems with lower canopy cover. Additionally, our study outlines evidence that vegetation responses to prescribed fire are site-dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71410
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Prescribed Fire on Artificial Wild Turkey Nest Survival in Closed‐Canopy Mixed Hardwood Forest

William D. Gulsby, Robert A. Gitzen, Michael L. McInnis, Bret A. Collier
1 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Avian ecology and behavior
1.72
article

The Effects of Prescribed Fire on Artificial Wild Turkey Nest Survival in Closed‐Canopy Mixed Hardwood Forest

William D. Gulsby, Robert A. Gitzen, Michael L. McInnis, Bret A. Collier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The eastern wild turkey (<i>Meleagris gallopavo</i>) is an economically and culturally important upland game bird that has recently declined in abundance across portions of the Southeast. Prescribed fire can be used to improve vegetation conditions for wild turkey nesting and brooding, but there are concerns that the application of large-scale prescribed fire can directly or indirectly impact turkey nest success. Therefore, there is a need to improve understanding of the effects of large-scale burns on turkey reproduction, particularly how fire effects on vegetation might affect nest success rates. We implemented an artificial nest study on the Talladega National Forest in northeast Alabama, where prescribed fire is implemented across ≤ 8000 ha annually in large (> 300 ha) burn units. We monitored a total of 230 artificial turkey nests during April-May 2019 and 2020. Nests were systematically distributed throughout the study area at a density of 1 nest/202 ha in areas burned 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-10 years prior to ensure proportional representation of time since fire. The overall artificial nest predation rate was 25%. Top predators included gray foxes (<i>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</i>; 10 nests), opossums (<i>Didelphis virginiana</i>; 9 nests), and coyotes (<i>Canis latrans</i>; 7 nests). We did not detect a relationship between time since fire (<i>p</i> > 0.05) or vegetation measurements (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and artificial nest predation. We believe the patterns we observed were explained by high overstory canopy cover (~90%) across the study area that limited vegetation response to fire. By mediating the potential effects of fire on understory vegetation structure, overstory canopy cover influences the degree to which fire alters concealment cover for nesting hens. Additional research is needed to determine whether large-scale prescribed fire directly or indirectly affects wild turkey nest success in systems with lower canopy cover. Additionally, our study outlines evidence that vegetation responses to prescribed fire are site-dependent.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(5)
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (US), Auburn University (US)
U.S. Forest Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Avian ecology and behavior
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.