Welcoming or banning ChatGPT in higher education: Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines

The advent of artificial intelligence generative tools, specifically ChatGPT, has revolutionized the academic community, highlighting its positive contribution to both students and teachers. However, teachers have raised a lot of concerns, including ethical issues and academic integrity. This paper aims to explore the views and recommendations of professors on the use of ChatGPT by students in higher education. Using phenomenography, 22 professors in higher education from Malaysia (6), Indonesia (5), and the Philippines (11) willingly participated in the Key Informant Interviews (KII). Results revealed that the professors’ views were divided into negative impacts (technology dependence and ethical problems) and positive contributions (user's convenience and enhancement of writing content). Moreover, they recommended (1) training on the proper use of ChatGPT and (2) protocols for using ChatGPT. The views and recommendations of the professors showed the inevitability of ChatGPT's use in higher education. Hence, the need for policies and guidance is also foreseeable and should be in place to guide and deter any ethical problems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜˜Thœe œPalawan scientist
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69721/tps.j.2025.17.2.02
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Welcoming or banning ChatGPT in higher education: Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines

Randy A. Tudy, Chee Keong Chin, Bonifacio Jr Gabales, Ida Tudy
˜˜Thœe œPalawan scientist
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Welcoming or banning ChatGPT in higher education: Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines

Randy A. Tudy, Chee Keong Chin, Bonifacio Jr Gabales, Ida Tudy
article en

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence generative tools, specifically ChatGPT, has revolutionized the academic community, highlighting its positive contribution to both students and teachers. However, teachers have raised a lot of concerns, including ethical issues and academic integrity. This paper aims to explore the views and recommendations of professors on the use of ChatGPT by students in higher education. Using phenomenography, 22 professors in higher education from Malaysia (6), Indonesia (5), and the Philippines (11) willingly participated in the Key Informant Interviews (KII). Results revealed that the professors’ views were divided into negative impacts (technology dependence and ethical problems) and positive contributions (user's convenience and enhancement of writing content). Moreover, they recommended (1) training on the proper use of ChatGPT and (2) protocols for using ChatGPT. The views and recommendations of the professors showed the inevitability of ChatGPT's use in higher education. Hence, the need for policies and guidance is also foreseeable and should be in place to guide and deter any ethical problems.

˜˜Thœe œPalawan scientistVol. 17(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.