The Need to Recalibrate the Scales: Balancing Secularism and the Right to Wear a Hijab in Europe

The European Convention on Human Rights protects the fundamental right to manifest one's religious beliefs, including protecting a Muslim woman's right to wear a hijab. Nevertheless, some member states have prohibited Muslim women from wearing a hijab in certain contexts to safeguard the principle of secularism, and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has upheld these restrictions in four key cases. This article argues that the Court's decisions in these cases are not justifiable as the Court has conducted an inadequate analysis of the necessity and proportionality of the restrictive measures and applied an unduly wide margin of appreciation. It also argues that some member states may be relying upon abstract aims like "secularism" and "living together" as a façade to disguise hostility toward Islam and that the Court has been unwilling to address this concern. This article concludes with three recommendations for reform that aim to address the flaws in the Court's analysis and allow the Court to strike a more appropriate balance between state autonomy and the protection of fundamental individual rights. These reforms are necessary to promote tolerance in Europe and prevent states from relying on abstract principles to unduly restrict individual rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Victoria University of Wellington Law Review
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v55i2.9802
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Need to Recalibrate the Scales: Balancing Secularism and the Right to Wear a Hijab in Europe

Lia Horsley
Victoria University of Wellington Law Review
Islamic Studies and History
article

The Need to Recalibrate the Scales: Balancing Secularism and the Right to Wear a Hijab in Europe

Lia Horsley
article en

Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights protects the fundamental right to manifest one's religious beliefs, including protecting a Muslim woman's right to wear a hijab. Nevertheless, some member states have prohibited Muslim women from wearing a hijab in certain contexts to safeguard the principle of secularism, and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has upheld these restrictions in four key cases. This article argues that the Court's decisions in these cases are not justifiable as the Court has conducted an inadequate analysis of the necessity and proportionality of the restrictive measures and applied an unduly wide margin of appreciation. It also argues that some member states may be relying upon abstract aims like "secularism" and "living together" as a façade to disguise hostility toward Islam and that the Court has been unwilling to address this concern. This article concludes with three recommendations for reform that aim to address the flaws in the Court's analysis and allow the Court to strike a more appropriate balance between state autonomy and the protection of fundamental individual rights. These reforms are necessary to promote tolerance in Europe and prevent states from relying on abstract principles to unduly restrict individual rights.

Victoria University of Wellington Law ReviewVol. 55(2)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Victoria University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Need to Recalibrate the Scales: Balancing Secularism and the Right to Wear a Hijab in Europe — Lia Horsley · Victoria University of Wellington Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS