Synthetic DNA and mitochondrial donation: no need for donor eggs?

Mitochondrial replacement therapy has been developed in order to prevent the transmission of mitochondrial mutations, yet it raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding the involvement of third-party DNA and the risks associated with donor procedures. This paper explores an alternative approach using synthetic DNA (synDNA) to construct mitochondrial organelles, thereby bypassing the need for donor oocytes and bypassing risks to donors. We argue that those who support mitochondrial replacement techniques as an ethically acceptable means of preventing the transmission of mitochondrial disease should consider the use of synthetic mitochondria as a preferable ethical alternative, should it prove technically viable. That this will be viable is more than we can demonstrate here. However, progress in synDNA technology suggests that it is not unreasonable to think that synthetic mitochondria creation is feasible, and perhaps even probable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110122
Primary Topic
Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthetic DNA and mitochondrial donation: no need for donor eggs?

Anna Smajdor, Daniela Cutas, Iain Brassington, Adrian Villalba
Journal of Medical Ethics
Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
article

Synthetic DNA and mitochondrial donation: no need for donor eggs?

Anna Smajdor, Daniela Cutas, Iain Brassington, Adrian Villalba
article en

Abstract

Mitochondrial replacement therapy has been developed in order to prevent the transmission of mitochondrial mutations, yet it raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding the involvement of third-party DNA and the risks associated with donor procedures. This paper explores an alternative approach using synthetic DNA (synDNA) to construct mitochondrial organelles, thereby bypassing the need for donor oocytes and bypassing risks to donors. We argue that those who support mitochondrial replacement techniques as an ethically acceptable means of preventing the transmission of mitochondrial disease should consider the use of synthetic mitochondria as a preferable ethical alternative, should it prove technically viable. That this will be viable is more than we can demonstrate here. However, progress in synDNA technology suggests that it is not unreasonable to think that synthetic mitochondria creation is feasible, and perhaps even probable.

Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 52(3)
Universidad de Granada (ES), University of Oslo (NO), Lund University (SE), Université Paris Cité (FR), Valencian International University (ES), University of Manchester (GB), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.