Regulating Judicial Lobbyists To Reform Supreme Court Ethics

Efforts to improve judicial ethics by addressing misconduct within the courts should also include efforts to improve public confidence in the judiciary by addressing misconduct of those outside of the courts. Supreme Court ethics controversies frequently involve the Justices’ relationships with individuals and organizations perceived as improperly influencing the Court, yet proposed solutions to the issue are usually limited to addressing the conduct of the Justices. This Article argues that the special interests who pay lobbyists to influence federal courts should be subjected to the same lobbying disclosure requirements as the special interests who pay lobbyists to influence the legislative and executive branches of government. Closing this obvious loophole in lobbying laws can result in more awareness of the individuals who seek to influence our courts and more meaningful restrictions on travel and other improper gifts that they provide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2024.1065
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Judicial Lobbyists To Reform Supreme Court Ethics

Kedric L. Payne
University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

Regulating Judicial Lobbyists To Reform Supreme Court Ethics

Kedric L. Payne
article en

Abstract

Efforts to improve judicial ethics by addressing misconduct within the courts should also include efforts to improve public confidence in the judiciary by addressing misconduct of those outside of the courts. Supreme Court ethics controversies frequently involve the Justices’ relationships with individuals and organizations perceived as improperly influencing the Court, yet proposed solutions to the issue are usually limited to addressing the conduct of the Justices. This Article argues that the special interests who pay lobbyists to influence federal courts should be subjected to the same lobbying disclosure requirements as the special interests who pay lobbyists to influence the legislative and executive branches of government. Closing this obvious loophole in lobbying laws can result in more awareness of the individuals who seek to influence our courts and more meaningful restrictions on travel and other improper gifts that they provide.

University of Pittsburgh Law ReviewVol. 86(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulating Judicial Lobbyists To Reform Supreme Court Ethics — Kedric L. Payne · University of Pittsburgh Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS