Artificial Intelligence Myths: Prevalence Among Turkish University Students and Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT Responses

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly emerged as a transformative technology across various disciplines. However, its widespread adoption is accompanied by numerous myths, which are fueled by limited public understanding and can significantly shape how individuals perceive and interact with AI, often leading to negative consequences such as misunderstanding, fear, or resistance. Despite the importance of addressing these myths, research on the prevalence of such beliefs remains insufficient, particularly in the Turkish context. This study aims to determine the prevalence of AI myths among Turkish university students, investigate the factors influencing the adoption of these myths, and compare student perceptions with ChatGPT's responses to the same myths. The study analyzed survey data from 288 students (102 males, 35.4%, and 186 females, 64.6%) using an AI-myth survey consisting of 18 items. Both descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to determine the prevalence of AI myths and investigate how factors such as academic background, gender, AI-related training, and media consumption influence the adoption of these myths. A comparative analysis was also performed between student responses and ChatGPT’s reactions to these myths. Analysis showed that certain AI myths are particularly prevalent among students. Students from technical disciplines demonstrated a greater ability to identify these myths, while prior AI training and media consumption had minimal impact. ChatGPT’s responses highlighted areas where better communication about AI is needed. The findings suggest that improving AI literacy and dispelling myths are essential for preparing students for more informed engagement with AI technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Participatory Educational Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.45.12.3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Myths: Prevalence Among Turkish University Students and Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT Responses

Yeliz Tunga, Ali Geriş, Berkan Çelik
2 citations
Participatory Educational Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Artificial Intelligence Myths: Prevalence Among Turkish University Students and Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT Responses

Yeliz Tunga, Ali Geriş, Berkan Çelik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly emerged as a transformative technology across various disciplines. However, its widespread adoption is accompanied by numerous myths, which are fueled by limited public understanding and can significantly shape how individuals perceive and interact with AI, often leading to negative consequences such as misunderstanding, fear, or resistance. Despite the importance of addressing these myths, research on the prevalence of such beliefs remains insufficient, particularly in the Turkish context. This study aims to determine the prevalence of AI myths among Turkish university students, investigate the factors influencing the adoption of these myths, and compare student perceptions with ChatGPT's responses to the same myths. The study analyzed survey data from 288 students (102 males, 35.4%, and 186 females, 64.6%) using an AI-myth survey consisting of 18 items. Both descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to determine the prevalence of AI myths and investigate how factors such as academic background, gender, AI-related training, and media consumption influence the adoption of these myths. A comparative analysis was also performed between student responses and ChatGPT’s reactions to these myths. Analysis showed that certain AI myths are particularly prevalent among students. Students from technical disciplines demonstrated a greater ability to identify these myths, while prior AI training and media consumption had minimal impact. ChatGPT’s responses highlighted areas where better communication about AI is needed. The findings suggest that improving AI literacy and dispelling myths are essential for preparing students for more informed engagement with AI technologies.

Participatory Educational ResearchVol. 12(3)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR), Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.