Not all flowers' visitors are pollinators: Combining indicators to identify their role in the cocoa pollination service

Animal pollination is critical for wild plant reproduction and crop yield. However, not all flower visitors are necessarily pollinators. Using cocoa ( Theobroma cacao L.) as a case study, we explored a combination of indicators to assess the effectiveness of flower visitors as pollinators. We first investigated the potential trade-off between the quality and quantity of pollen deposited on the limitation of pollination success in a hand pollination trial under controlled conditions. We found that the fruit set and ovule fecundation rate are mainly driven by the quantity of pollen grain deposited. We then conducted transects and video monitoring in the field in Ecuador to compare the performance of cocoa flower visitors as pollinators using several indicators. We found that small crawling arthropods, in particular ants and aphids, proved to be promising pollinators, with a higher level of pollination with viable pollen being observed on the flowers they visited. Ants were even more efficient than other visitors in depositing significant numbers of pollen grains on the styles. Instead, stingless bees and microdiptera were less efficient when depositing pollen, but complementary to small crawling arthropods in the time of flower visits. Interestingly, we found that others cocoa flower visitors were detrimental to the pollination service, such as hemipteran nymphs and caterpillars. We conclude that cocoa plantation management focused on increasing the complementarity of pollinator visits, acting at different periods of the day and with distinct behaviours, could improve pollination services, and that the use of multiple indicators should be advocated in future research to assess pollinator effectiveness. • Animal pollination is critical in agriculture but not all flowers’ visitors are pollinators. • The success of cocoa pollination is mainly driven by the quantity of pollen grains deposited. • Some cocoa flower visitors are pollinators, but others hinder pollination services. • Ants are more effective than other visitors in depositing pollen grains on the styles. • Cocoa pollination services may rely on the complementarity of several pollinators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109716
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not all flowers' visitors are pollinators: Combining indicators to identify their role in the cocoa pollination service

Nelly Judith Paredes Andrade, Isabelle Merle, Xavier Argout, Jimmy Trinidad Pico Rosado et al.
2 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
5.49
article

Not all flowers' visitors are pollinators: Combining indicators to identify their role in the cocoa pollination service

Nelly Judith Paredes Andrade, Isabelle Merle, Xavier Argout, Jimmy Trinidad Pico Rosado, Fabrice Réquier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Animal pollination is critical for wild plant reproduction and crop yield. However, not all flower visitors are necessarily pollinators. Using cocoa ( Theobroma cacao L.) as a case study, we explored a combination of indicators to assess the effectiveness of flower visitors as pollinators. We first investigated the potential trade-off between the quality and quantity of pollen deposited on the limitation of pollination success in a hand pollination trial under controlled conditions. We found that the fruit set and ovule fecundation rate are mainly driven by the quantity of pollen grain deposited. We then conducted transects and video monitoring in the field in Ecuador to compare the performance of cocoa flower visitors as pollinators using several indicators. We found that small crawling arthropods, in particular ants and aphids, proved to be promising pollinators, with a higher level of pollination with viable pollen being observed on the flowers they visited. Ants were even more efficient than other visitors in depositing significant numbers of pollen grains on the styles. Instead, stingless bees and microdiptera were less efficient when depositing pollen, but complementary to small crawling arthropods in the time of flower visits. Interestingly, we found that others cocoa flower visitors were detrimental to the pollination service, such as hemipteran nymphs and caterpillars. We conclude that cocoa plantation management focused on increasing the complementarity of pollinator visits, acting at different periods of the day and with distinct behaviours, could improve pollination services, and that the use of multiple indicators should be advocated in future research to assess pollinator effectiveness. • Animal pollination is critical in agriculture but not all flowers’ visitors are pollinators. • The success of cocoa pollination is mainly driven by the quantity of pollen grains deposited. • Some cocoa flower visitors are pollinators, but others hinder pollination services. • Ants are more effective than other visitors in depositing pollen grains on the styles. • Cocoa pollination services may rely on the complementarity of several pollinators.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 390
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Évolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie (FR), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (EC), Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes méditerranéennes et tropicales (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
5.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.