Identification in global and virtual teams: a systematic literature review

Abstract Research on team identification highlights its critical role in effective teamwork, especially in global and virtual teams. Despite its significance, the fragmented nature of existing studies, with studies conducted across varied contexts, limits a cohesive understanding of the phenomenon. Given the complexities of team identification in global and virtual settings, further research is necessary to examine how unique challenges within these environments modify the impact of identification compared to traditional teams. To address this gap, this study employs a systematic literature review, conducting a thematic analysis of 45 articles to categorize research into three distinct team categories: (1) monocultural teams with virtual meeting environments; (2) multicultural teams with non-virtual meeting environments; and (3) multicultural teams with virtual meeting environments. These categories are examined comprehensively to analyze identification development and outcomes across global and virtual teams. Subsequently, they are integrated into a cohesive framework that explains identification’s role within global and virtual teams. The framework highlights the fragmented yet progressive nature of existing research and identifies promising directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Managerial Science
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00890-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification in global and virtual teams: a systematic literature review

Hau Thi Kim
1 citations
Review of Managerial Science
Team Dynamics and Performance
2.44
article

Identification in global and virtual teams: a systematic literature review

Hau Thi Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Research on team identification highlights its critical role in effective teamwork, especially in global and virtual teams. Despite its significance, the fragmented nature of existing studies, with studies conducted across varied contexts, limits a cohesive understanding of the phenomenon. Given the complexities of team identification in global and virtual settings, further research is necessary to examine how unique challenges within these environments modify the impact of identification compared to traditional teams. To address this gap, this study employs a systematic literature review, conducting a thematic analysis of 45 articles to categorize research into three distinct team categories: (1) monocultural teams with virtual meeting environments; (2) multicultural teams with non-virtual meeting environments; and (3) multicultural teams with virtual meeting environments. These categories are examined comprehensively to analyze identification development and outcomes across global and virtual teams. Subsequently, they are integrated into a cohesive framework that explains identification’s role within global and virtual teams. The framework highlights the fragmented yet progressive nature of existing research and identifies promising directions for future research.

Review of Managerial ScienceVol. 20(3)
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
Libera Università di Bolzano
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Team Dynamics and Performance
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.