Public Health and New Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading causes of death among men worldwide. Early detection is crucial for effective treatment, and several screening strategies have been developed to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce false positives. This study compares new prostate cancer screening strategies, assessing their effectiveness, accuracy, cost-effectiveness and impact on patients' quality of life. Methodology: This comparative observational study analyzed clinical data from men aged 50 to 75 years without a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer. A literature search was conducted to determine advances in diagnosis and treatment efficacy. Results: The results showed that the combination of PSA and multiparametric MRI increased diagnostic accuracy and reduced false positives. Liquid biopsy was a promising, less invasive tool with potential for early detection. In terms of cost-benefit, the multimodal approach proved to be advantageous, considering the costs of subsequent examinations and treatments, as well as the impacts on patients' quality of life. Conclusion: New prostate cancer screening strategies have distinct advantages and limitations. Combining methods significantly improves clinical outcomes, reducing mortality and promoting a better quality of life for patients. This study highlights the importance of a multimodal approach to prostate cancer screening and the need for continued research to validate these strategies in different populations and clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Healthcare Review (online)
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56226/97
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Health and New Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies

Kelly Cristina Uniat, L. Ribeiro
3 citations
International Healthcare Review (online)
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
4.56
article

Public Health and New Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies

Kelly Cristina Uniat, L. Ribeiro
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading causes of death among men worldwide. Early detection is crucial for effective treatment, and several screening strategies have been developed to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce false positives. This study compares new prostate cancer screening strategies, assessing their effectiveness, accuracy, cost-effectiveness and impact on patients' quality of life. Methodology: This comparative observational study analyzed clinical data from men aged 50 to 75 years without a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer. A literature search was conducted to determine advances in diagnosis and treatment efficacy. Results: The results showed that the combination of PSA and multiparametric MRI increased diagnostic accuracy and reduced false positives. Liquid biopsy was a promising, less invasive tool with potential for early detection. In terms of cost-benefit, the multimodal approach proved to be advantageous, considering the costs of subsequent examinations and treatments, as well as the impacts on patients' quality of life. Conclusion: New prostate cancer screening strategies have distinct advantages and limitations. Combining methods significantly improves clinical outcomes, reducing mortality and promoting a better quality of life for patients. This study highlights the importance of a multimodal approach to prostate cancer screening and the need for continued research to validate these strategies in different populations and clinical settings.

International Healthcare Review (online)
Universidad Columbia del Paraguay (PY), Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.