Determining Consumers' Ecological Footprint Awareness Within the Scope of SDG 12: a Study on University Students

Objective: The aim of the study is to determine the level of knowledge and awareness of university students about ecological footprint within the scope of SDG 12. Theoretical Framework: Ecological footprint, which has an important place in environmental sustainability and protection of natural resources, is an indicator that measures the impact of individuals on natural resources. In the related literature, it is emphasized that individuals' knowledge and awareness of ecological footprint is one of the main factors affecting their environmental attitudes and behaviors. Therefore, increasing awareness of ecological footprint will contribute to the development of environmental awareness and the adoption of sustainable lifestyles. Method: An ecological footprint scale consisting of five dimensions: food, transportation and housing, energy, waste and water consumption was used. Data were collected from 314 university students through an online questionnaire using Google Form. With the SPSS 20 program, Independent Samples T-Test and ANOVA tests were applied to determine whether the ecological footprint knowledge and awareness levels of the students differed according to gender and year of birth. Results and Discussion: As a result of the analyzes, the sub-dimensions with the highest ecological footprint awareness were “Water Consumption” and “Wastes”. The dimension with the lowest awareness is the “Food” sub-dimension. As a result of the independent samples t-test, women's awareness was higher than men's for all dimensions. According to the birth years of the students, there was a significant difference only for the transportation and accommodation sub-dimension. The ecological footprint awareness of those born in 1999-1990 is higher than those born in 1989-1980. Research Implications: The findings of this study will enable the university to evaluate the effectiveness of environmental education programs. In this context, various strategies can be developed to increase students' knowledge and awareness of ecological footprint. In the future, conducting future studies with more students in different universities can provide broad generalizations on this issue. Originality/Value: The results of the study will provide an important basis for the development of future educational policies and awareness-raising strategies in the field of environmental sustainability. In this respect, the research is valuable not only for the academic literature but also for providing practical suggestions for promoting environmentally friendly behaviors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n05.pe06043
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining Consumers' Ecological Footprint Awareness Within the Scope of SDG 12: a Study on University Students

Murat Gülmez, Deniz Yalçıntaş, Özge Çetiner, Duygu Gür et al.
1 citations
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.07
article

Determining Consumers' Ecological Footprint Awareness Within the Scope of SDG 12: a Study on University Students

Murat Gülmez, Deniz Yalçıntaş, Özge Çetiner, Duygu Gür, Eda Yaşa Özeltürkay, Suzan Oğuz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to determine the level of knowledge and awareness of university students about ecological footprint within the scope of SDG 12. Theoretical Framework: Ecological footprint, which has an important place in environmental sustainability and protection of natural resources, is an indicator that measures the impact of individuals on natural resources. In the related literature, it is emphasized that individuals' knowledge and awareness of ecological footprint is one of the main factors affecting their environmental attitudes and behaviors. Therefore, increasing awareness of ecological footprint will contribute to the development of environmental awareness and the adoption of sustainable lifestyles. Method: An ecological footprint scale consisting of five dimensions: food, transportation and housing, energy, waste and water consumption was used. Data were collected from 314 university students through an online questionnaire using Google Form. With the SPSS 20 program, Independent Samples T-Test and ANOVA tests were applied to determine whether the ecological footprint knowledge and awareness levels of the students differed according to gender and year of birth. Results and Discussion: As a result of the analyzes, the sub-dimensions with the highest ecological footprint awareness were “Water Consumption” and “Wastes”. The dimension with the lowest awareness is the “Food” sub-dimension. As a result of the independent samples t-test, women's awareness was higher than men's for all dimensions. According to the birth years of the students, there was a significant difference only for the transportation and accommodation sub-dimension. The ecological footprint awareness of those born in 1999-1990 is higher than those born in 1989-1980. Research Implications: The findings of this study will enable the university to evaluate the effectiveness of environmental education programs. In this context, various strategies can be developed to increase students' knowledge and awareness of ecological footprint. In the future, conducting future studies with more students in different universities can provide broad generalizations on this issue. Originality/Value: The results of the study will provide an important basis for the development of future educational policies and awareness-raising strategies in the field of environmental sustainability. In this respect, the research is valuable not only for the academic literature but also for providing practical suggestions for promoting environmentally friendly behaviors.

Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs ReviewVol. 5(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.