Development and Reliability-Validity Testing of a Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior (KAB)-Based Scale for University Students' Academic Use of AI Tools

To develop and validate a scale for assessing the knowledge and behaviors related to academic use norms of AI tools among university students, focusing on reliability and validity. Grounded in the Knowledge-Attitude-Behavior (KAB) theory, a pool of scale items was constructed through a review of the literature, semi-structured interviews, and Delphi expert consultations. A pilot test was conducted with 140 undergraduate nursing students from a certain university in China, employing item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to refine the scale items. A formal assessment was then conducted with 220 nursing undergraduates who had used generative AI tools for at least three months. Reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed using SPSS and AMOS. The scale consists of 2 subscales, 3 dimensions, and 14 items. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three common factors, with a cumulative variance explanation of 70.878%. The Cronbach's α coefficients for the subscales were 0.925 and 0.855, respectively, while the split-half reliability coefficients were 0.891 and 0.860. The fit indices for the confirmatory factor model were as follows: χ2/df=2.978, GFI=0.859, PGFI=0.606, RMSEA=0.098, RMR=0.048, CFI=0.920, and PCFI=0.748. The scale demonstrates strong reliability and validity, making it suitable for assessing university students' knowledge and behaviors regarding the academic use of AI tools.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Health and Medical Research
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijphmr.v3n3.02
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Reliability-Validity Testing of a Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior (KAB)-Based Scale for University Students' Academic Use of AI Tools

Lulu Xiao, Fan Ouyang, Yangli Ou, Zhiyuan Zhang et al.
International Journal of Public Health and Medical Research
Technology and Data Analysis
article

Development and Reliability-Validity Testing of a Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior (KAB)-Based Scale for University Students' Academic Use of AI Tools

Lulu Xiao, Fan Ouyang, Yangli Ou, Zhiyuan Zhang, Nancy A. Aguila
article en

Abstract

To develop and validate a scale for assessing the knowledge and behaviors related to academic use norms of AI tools among university students, focusing on reliability and validity. Grounded in the Knowledge-Attitude-Behavior (KAB) theory, a pool of scale items was constructed through a review of the literature, semi-structured interviews, and Delphi expert consultations. A pilot test was conducted with 140 undergraduate nursing students from a certain university in China, employing item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to refine the scale items. A formal assessment was then conducted with 220 nursing undergraduates who had used generative AI tools for at least three months. Reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed using SPSS and AMOS. The scale consists of 2 subscales, 3 dimensions, and 14 items. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three common factors, with a cumulative variance explanation of 70.878%. The Cronbach's α coefficients for the subscales were 0.925 and 0.855, respectively, while the split-half reliability coefficients were 0.891 and 0.860. The fit indices for the confirmatory factor model were as follows: χ2/df=2.978, GFI=0.859, PGFI=0.606, RMSEA=0.098, RMR=0.048, CFI=0.920, and PCFI=0.748. The scale demonstrates strong reliability and validity, making it suitable for assessing university students' knowledge and behaviors regarding the academic use of AI tools.

International Journal of Public Health and Medical ResearchVol. 3(3)
University of South China
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Technology and Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.