Paradoxical Leadership, Experienced Tensions, and Counterproductive Behavior: Moderation by Consistency and Gender

Complementing theory and evidence for the positive effects of paradoxical leadership, we argue that paradoxical leadership can also result in tensions from the awareness it raises of conflicting paradoxical demands and the expectation that subordinates strive to maximize on these demands even when they are conflicting. Such tensions may result in counterproductive behavior. This gives rise to the question of how these negative effects of paradoxical leadership may be attenuated. Addressing this issue, we argue that higher consistency of paradoxical leadership reduces uncertainty and thus attenuates experienced tensions and counterproductive behavior following from these tensions, and more so for male subordinates who, on average, have less experience dealing with work-related conflicting demands than female subordinates. We found support for this moderated mediation model in a repeated-measures survey ( N = 107 individuals; N = 1027 weekly observations). We discuss implications of our findings for theory and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518251336325
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradoxical Leadership, Experienced Tensions, and Counterproductive Behavior: Moderation by Consistency and Gender

Daan van Knippenberg, Neha Tripathi, Charmi Patel
3 citations
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Gender Diversity and Inequality
11.60
article

Paradoxical Leadership, Experienced Tensions, and Counterproductive Behavior: Moderation by Consistency and Gender

Daan van Knippenberg, Neha Tripathi, Charmi Patel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Complementing theory and evidence for the positive effects of paradoxical leadership, we argue that paradoxical leadership can also result in tensions from the awareness it raises of conflicting paradoxical demands and the expectation that subordinates strive to maximize on these demands even when they are conflicting. Such tensions may result in counterproductive behavior. This gives rise to the question of how these negative effects of paradoxical leadership may be attenuated. Addressing this issue, we argue that higher consistency of paradoxical leadership reduces uncertainty and thus attenuates experienced tensions and counterproductive behavior following from these tensions, and more so for male subordinates who, on average, have less experience dealing with work-related conflicting demands than female subordinates. We found support for this moderated mediation model in a repeated-measures survey ( N = 107 individuals; N = 1027 weekly observations). We discuss implications of our findings for theory and practice.

Journal of Leadership & Organizational StudiesVol. 32(4)
Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IN), University of Reading (GB), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
11.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.