Legitimization Tools or Governance Tools? A Systematic Literature Review of Corporate Governance and Carbon Disclosure Quality

ABSTRACT As global climate challenges intensify, corporate carbon disclosure quality (CDQ) has emerged as a vital indicator of corporate environmental transparency and accountability. However, corporate governance (CG) mechanisms remain contested: are they primarily legitimation tools to meet external expectations or governance instruments to ensure substantive environmental performance? This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) utilizing the PRISMA framework, methodically screening and synthesizing 64 studies published between 2011 and 2024. Key findings encompass (1) Persistent suboptimal CDQ across both developed and emerging markets; (2) A trend towards theoretical integration, with the CG‐CDQ relationship increasingly reflecting the interplay of multiple theoretical frameworks; (3) Dynamic duality of CG's role, wherein its primary function depends on institutional pressure, governance architecture, and stakeholder oversight; (4) Bridging institutional voids in emerging economies, as demonstrated by China's state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) surpassing non‐state‐owned firms under policy incentives. This study also identifies critical research gaps: over two‐thirds of CG‐CDQ studies concentrate on the US, Europe, and China, while ASEAN and Africa—carbon‐intensive regions—remain underexplored, constituting a 90% research void. The cultural dimension is frequently neglected, with only one study examining informal institutions, such as Confucianism. These findings highlight that governments should mandate carbon disclosure standards, implement cross‐border accreditation mechanisms, and enhance social oversight; corporations should bolster governance, incorporate environmental expertise, and ensure that 30% of their executives are female; and investors should advocate for ESG performance agreements that correlate carbon disclosure with investment returns, fostering sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy & Development
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70117
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimization Tools or Governance Tools? A Systematic Literature Review of Corporate Governance and Carbon Disclosure Quality

Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh Hassan, Tze San Ong, Guifang Zhu
3 citations
Business Strategy & Development
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
6.68
article

Legitimization Tools or Governance Tools? A Systematic Literature Review of Corporate Governance and Carbon Disclosure Quality

Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh Hassan, Tze San Ong, Guifang Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As global climate challenges intensify, corporate carbon disclosure quality (CDQ) has emerged as a vital indicator of corporate environmental transparency and accountability. However, corporate governance (CG) mechanisms remain contested: are they primarily legitimation tools to meet external expectations or governance instruments to ensure substantive environmental performance? This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) utilizing the PRISMA framework, methodically screening and synthesizing 64 studies published between 2011 and 2024. Key findings encompass (1) Persistent suboptimal CDQ across both developed and emerging markets; (2) A trend towards theoretical integration, with the CG‐CDQ relationship increasingly reflecting the interplay of multiple theoretical frameworks; (3) Dynamic duality of CG's role, wherein its primary function depends on institutional pressure, governance architecture, and stakeholder oversight; (4) Bridging institutional voids in emerging economies, as demonstrated by China's state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) surpassing non‐state‐owned firms under policy incentives. This study also identifies critical research gaps: over two‐thirds of CG‐CDQ studies concentrate on the US, Europe, and China, while ASEAN and Africa—carbon‐intensive regions—remain underexplored, constituting a 90% research void. The cultural dimension is frequently neglected, with only one study examining informal institutions, such as Confucianism. These findings highlight that governments should mandate carbon disclosure standards, implement cross‐border accreditation mechanisms, and enhance social oversight; corporations should bolster governance, incorporate environmental expertise, and ensure that 30% of their executives are female; and investors should advocate for ESG performance agreements that correlate carbon disclosure with investment returns, fostering sustainable development.

Business Strategy & DevelopmentVol. 8(2)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY), Daffodil International University (BD), Nanfang Hospital (CN), Nanfang College Guangzhou
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.