Investigating the effect of storage materials on the quality of potable water

The quality of potable water can deteriorate significantly when stored in different types of containers, potentially posing health risks to consumers. Water storage containers, made from materials like plastic, clay, and aluminum, can interact with water both chemically and biologically, leading to contamination. Understanding how different storage materials affect water quality is crucial, especially in regions relying on extended storage. This study aims to evaluate the impact of different storage container materials (white plastic, blue plastic, clay, and aluminum) on the physio-chemical and bacteriological properties of potable water. Water samples were collected from a hand pump at FUTO Hostel C and subjected to laboratory tests both before and after storage in white plastic, blue plastic, clay, and aluminum containers. The parameters tested included pH, turbidity, conductivity, total dissolved solids, dissolved oxygen, total hardness, total chloride, manganese, iron, chromium, lead, and bacterial counts (heterotrophic and coliform). Water quality indices were calculated based on the Nigerian Industrial Standards (NIS 977:2017). The initial water quality was classified as “good” with a water quality index (WQI) of 34.98. However, after storage, significant deterioration was observed across all container types. Water stored in white plastic had a WQI of 91.69, while blue plastic resulted in a WQI of 78.87, both indicating “very poor” water quality. Clay storage also yielded a “very poor” WQI of 76.97, mainly due to increased turbidity and bacterial contamination. The most severe deterioration was seen in aluminum containers, with a WQI of 217.67, classifying the water as “unfit for consumption” due to excessive manganese (1.8 mg/L) and iron (0.51 mg/L) contamination. The study reveals that none of the materials tested is ideal for long-term potable water storage. Plastic and aluminum containers lead to significant chemical contamination, while clay containers promote bacterial growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Sustainable Development Research
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16355
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the effect of storage materials on the quality of potable water

N. C. Nwachukwu, Peace Ikponmwosa Binibor, Godson Ukandu Ndulue, David Uchenna Ndukwe et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Sustainable Development Research
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
1.63
article

Investigating the effect of storage materials on the quality of potable water

N. C. Nwachukwu, Peace Ikponmwosa Binibor, Godson Ukandu Ndulue, David Uchenna Ndukwe, Adrian Obumneme Vincent Ngwu, Osigbeme Hakeem Usman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The quality of potable water can deteriorate significantly when stored in different types of containers, potentially posing health risks to consumers. Water storage containers, made from materials like plastic, clay, and aluminum, can interact with water both chemically and biologically, leading to contamination. Understanding how different storage materials affect water quality is crucial, especially in regions relying on extended storage. This study aims to evaluate the impact of different storage container materials (white plastic, blue plastic, clay, and aluminum) on the physio-chemical and bacteriological properties of potable water. Water samples were collected from a hand pump at FUTO Hostel C and subjected to laboratory tests both before and after storage in white plastic, blue plastic, clay, and aluminum containers. The parameters tested included pH, turbidity, conductivity, total dissolved solids, dissolved oxygen, total hardness, total chloride, manganese, iron, chromium, lead, and bacterial counts (heterotrophic and coliform). Water quality indices were calculated based on the Nigerian Industrial Standards (NIS 977:2017). The initial water quality was classified as “good” with a water quality index (WQI) of 34.98. However, after storage, significant deterioration was observed across all container types. Water stored in white plastic had a WQI of 91.69, while blue plastic resulted in a WQI of 78.87, both indicating “very poor” water quality. Clay storage also yielded a “very poor” WQI of 76.97, mainly due to increased turbidity and bacterial contamination. The most severe deterioration was seen in aluminum containers, with a WQI of 217.67, classifying the water as “unfit for consumption” due to excessive manganese (1.8 mg/L) and iron (0.51 mg/L) contamination. The study reveals that none of the materials tested is ideal for long-term potable water storage. Plastic and aluminum containers lead to significant chemical contamination, while clay containers promote bacterial growth.

European Journal of Sustainable Development ResearchVol. 9(3)
Federal University of Technology Owerri (NG), Ambrose Alli University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.