Marx and the Accusations of Antisemitism, Racism, and Eurocentrism: An Introduction

The question whether the founding father of scientific communism and universal emancipation himself was antisemitic, racist, and Eurocentric is highly explosive for obvious reasons. Dogmatics has tended to wipe away all accusations as they were seen almost heretical. Reactionaries have simultaneously taken those quotations to prove the hypocrisy of revolutionary Marxists, who claim to fight for universal emancipation, while worshipping an old racist. However, things are way more complex. Neither should all accusations be rejected dogmatically nor can they be affirmed. Both sides tend to ignore the fact, that Marx himself underwent several crucial epistemic breaks and theoretical learnings. The article tries to give a brief introduction in three main points of discussion. It cannot be understood as a detailed analysis, but merely as an overview about the ambiguities in play. The aim therefore is not to completely free Marx from all reproaches or to completely condemn him but to stress his own ambiguities and thereafter argue for an undogmatic treatment of this highly ambivalent heritage of socialist theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Society
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251334198
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marx and the Accusations of Antisemitism, Racism, and Eurocentrism: An Introduction

Joshua Graf
1 citations
Science & Society
Political Economy and Marxism
4.20
article

Marx and the Accusations of Antisemitism, Racism, and Eurocentrism: An Introduction

Joshua Graf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The question whether the founding father of scientific communism and universal emancipation himself was antisemitic, racist, and Eurocentric is highly explosive for obvious reasons. Dogmatics has tended to wipe away all accusations as they were seen almost heretical. Reactionaries have simultaneously taken those quotations to prove the hypocrisy of revolutionary Marxists, who claim to fight for universal emancipation, while worshipping an old racist. However, things are way more complex. Neither should all accusations be rejected dogmatically nor can they be affirmed. Both sides tend to ignore the fact, that Marx himself underwent several crucial epistemic breaks and theoretical learnings. The article tries to give a brief introduction in three main points of discussion. It cannot be understood as a detailed analysis, but merely as an overview about the ambiguities in play. The aim therefore is not to completely free Marx from all reproaches or to completely condemn him but to stress his own ambiguities and thereafter argue for an undogmatic treatment of this highly ambivalent heritage of socialist theory.

Science & SocietyVol. 89(3)
Osnabrück University (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Political Economy and Marxism
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.