Non‐Standard Contingent Employment and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job Characteristics

ABSTRACT Non‐standard contingent employment has become a hallmark of contemporary labour markets, raising widespread concerns regarding job quality and worker well‐being. Using job satisfaction as a proxy for well‐being, previous studies have generally observed lower levels of satisfaction among contingent workers relative to permanent workers. Substantial heterogeneity nevertheless exists, with self‐employed workers often reporting greater levels of satisfaction and casual and labour‐hire workers reporting lower levels of satisfaction. We revisit these findings and examine the role of job characteristics in explaining these results. Using data on a wide range of job attributes from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, we show that contingent employment differs from permanent employment on several dimensions including flexibility and autonomy, skill use and job security. These differences explain previously observed gaps in job satisfaction, suggesting that job characteristics play a crucial mediating role in the relationship between contingent employment and worker well‐being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Industrial Relations
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12890
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐Standard Contingent Employment and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job Characteristics

Greg Marston, Christine Ablaza, Rose‐Marie Stambe, Arianna Gatta
British Journal of Industrial Relations
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Non‐Standard Contingent Employment and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job Characteristics

Greg Marston, Christine Ablaza, Rose‐Marie Stambe, Arianna Gatta
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Non‐standard contingent employment has become a hallmark of contemporary labour markets, raising widespread concerns regarding job quality and worker well‐being. Using job satisfaction as a proxy for well‐being, previous studies have generally observed lower levels of satisfaction among contingent workers relative to permanent workers. Substantial heterogeneity nevertheless exists, with self‐employed workers often reporting greater levels of satisfaction and casual and labour‐hire workers reporting lower levels of satisfaction. We revisit these findings and examine the role of job characteristics in explaining these results. Using data on a wide range of job attributes from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, we show that contingent employment differs from permanent employment on several dimensions including flexibility and autonomy, skill use and job security. These differences explain previously observed gaps in job satisfaction, suggesting that job characteristics play a crucial mediating role in the relationship between contingent employment and worker well‐being.

British Journal of Industrial RelationsVol. 63(4)
The University of Queensland (AU), Flinders University (AU)
Australian Government, Department of Social Services, Australian Government, University of Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.