Distress Tolerance as a Moderator of Affective Forecasting Effects

Previous research has used real-time methods like ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine affective forecasting (predictions made regarding experience of affect and how this influences decision making, level of functioning, etc.), but has not specifically examined predictors of what determines how strongly daily forecasts of a day are associated with negative emotion experienced later in the day. The aim of this study was to examine how experience of distress tolerance would moderate daily-level affective forecasting effects. Our hypothesis stated that having poorer distress tolerance would mean that worse predictions of how good a day would be, would be more strongly associated with negative emotion later in the day. Analyses in a large sample of undergraduates (<i>N</i> = 411 drawn from a sample total sample of <i>N</i> = 675) supported this hypothesis. Future research should look to further explore distress tolerance as a moderator of affective forecasting, specifically within larger community samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Affective Science
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-025-00303-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distress Tolerance as a Moderator of Affective Forecasting Effects

Roscoe Garner, Evan M. Kleiman
2 citations
Affective Science
Mental Health Research Topics
4.24
article

Distress Tolerance as a Moderator of Affective Forecasting Effects

Roscoe Garner, Evan M. Kleiman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Previous research has used real-time methods like ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine affective forecasting (predictions made regarding experience of affect and how this influences decision making, level of functioning, etc.), but has not specifically examined predictors of what determines how strongly daily forecasts of a day are associated with negative emotion experienced later in the day. The aim of this study was to examine how experience of distress tolerance would moderate daily-level affective forecasting effects. Our hypothesis stated that having poorer distress tolerance would mean that worse predictions of how good a day would be, would be more strongly associated with negative emotion later in the day. Analyses in a large sample of undergraduates (<i>N</i> = 411 drawn from a sample total sample of <i>N</i> = 675) supported this hypothesis. Future research should look to further explore distress tolerance as a moderator of affective forecasting, specifically within larger community samples.

Affective ScienceVol. 6(2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health Research Topics
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.