<sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A multicenter prospective study in Japan

Background<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-2-deoxy-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET) is a biomarker of neuronal injury, according to the revised National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria.ObjectiveThis multicenter prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) in comparison with phosphorylated tau protein (p-tau181) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).MethodsIn total, 138 patients (AD, 119; FTLD, 19) from 11 participating institutions underwent clinical and neuropsychological examinations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CSF examination, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET at baseline. The cases were visually classified into predefined dementia patterns using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET by three experts. A region-of-interest (ROI)-based automated analysis of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET was also performed. The participants were followed up for 12 months, and the clinical diagnosis of dementia was re-evaluated.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the visual reading of<sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET for differentiating AD from FTLD were 94%, 78%, and 92%, respectively. In contrast, those of p-tau181 in CSF were 62%, 79%, and 65%, respectively. The sensitivity, the primary endpoint, was 32% higher for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET than for p-tau181 in CSF. Additionally, the accuracy, the secondary endpoint, was 27% higher for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET than for p-tau181 in CSF. In addition to the visual reading of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET, the ROI-based automated analysis showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 81%, 79%, and 81%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study showed that the diagnostic performance of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in differential diagnosis of AD and FTLD was higher than that of p-tau181 in CSF.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR (UMIN 000016427, https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180098, https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251338691
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

18 F-FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A multicenter prospective study in Japan

Mikio Shoji, Keisuke Suzuki, Yumiko Kutoku, Takeshi Kawarabayashi et al.
2 citations
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
2.94
article

18 F-FDG PET for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A multicenter prospective study in Japan

Mikio Shoji, Keisuke Suzuki, Yumiko Kutoku, Takeshi Kawarabayashi, Michio Kitayama, Harumasa Takano, Yasuomi Ouchi, Hiroaki Adachi, Yoshihide Sunada, Kenji Ishii, Kazunari Ishii, Noriyuki Kimura, Kazuhiro Hara, Takashi Kato, Kengo Ito, N. Sugimoto, Yukihiko Washimi, Chigusa Watanabe, Etsuro Matsubara
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-2-deoxy-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET) is a biomarker of neuronal injury, according to the revised National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria.ObjectiveThis multicenter prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) in comparison with phosphorylated tau protein (p-tau181) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).MethodsIn total, 138 patients (AD, 119; FTLD, 19) from 11 participating institutions underwent clinical and neuropsychological examinations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CSF examination, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET at baseline. The cases were visually classified into predefined dementia patterns using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET by three experts. A region-of-interest (ROI)-based automated analysis of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET was also performed. The participants were followed up for 12 months, and the clinical diagnosis of dementia was re-evaluated.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the visual reading of<sup>18</sup> F-FDG PET for differentiating AD from FTLD were 94%, 78%, and 92%, respectively. In contrast, those of p-tau181 in CSF were 62%, 79%, and 65%, respectively. The sensitivity, the primary endpoint, was 32% higher for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET than for p-tau181 in CSF. Additionally, the accuracy, the secondary endpoint, was 27% higher for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET than for p-tau181 in CSF. In addition to the visual reading of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET, the ROI-based automated analysis showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 81%, 79%, and 81%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study showed that the diagnostic performance of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in differential diagnosis of AD and FTLD was higher than that of p-tau181 in CSF.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR (UMIN 000016427, https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180098, https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/).

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 106(1)
University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP), Oita University (JP), Kawasaki Medical School (JP), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP), National Hospital Organization (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP), Hokuto Hospital (JP), National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP), Nagoya University (JP), Kindai University (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.