Mindful touch: Mid-air haptics facilitates novices’ subjective experiences of audio-guided mindfulness meditation

With perpetually stressful lives, people are prompted to consider slowing down through mindfulness meditation. We extend HCI research beyond its pre-existing focus on interaction-intensive meditation technologies, to focus simply on whether one’s sense of touch can facilitate meditation. We capitalise on the touchless nature of mid-air haptics by rendering subtle sensations on the palm during meditation, using one design derived from pilot testing. In a novel and exploratory between-subjects study, we compare audio versus audio-haptic guidance in adult novices’ mindfulness meditation, through a mixed methods approach which combines standardised questionnaires with micro-phenomenological interviews ( n =10 per group). Interestingly, mid-air haptics quantitatively increased both hindrance and relaxation, which appears conflicting but is actually complementary when considered together with qualitative analysis. Specifically, mid-air haptics initially distracted participants but eventually facilitated mindfulness through three processes (embodied metaphor, breath alignment, and meditative grounding), though this requires further validation. We reflect on the need for future work exploring an integrated, multimodal meditation experience. • Mid-air haptics was initially distracting but eventually facilitated mindfulness. • Flexibility of mid-air haptics addresses novices’ differing meditation abilities. • Mixed methods approaches are crucial in studying technology-assisted meditation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103528
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mindful touch: Mid-air haptics facilitates novices’ subjective experiences of audio-guided mindfulness meditation

Madhan Kumar Vasudevan, Shu Zhong, Desiree Cho, Marianna Obrist
3 citations
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
5.81
article

Mindful touch: Mid-air haptics facilitates novices’ subjective experiences of audio-guided mindfulness meditation

Madhan Kumar Vasudevan, Shu Zhong, Desiree Cho, Marianna Obrist
article en
3 citations

Abstract

With perpetually stressful lives, people are prompted to consider slowing down through mindfulness meditation. We extend HCI research beyond its pre-existing focus on interaction-intensive meditation technologies, to focus simply on whether one’s sense of touch can facilitate meditation. We capitalise on the touchless nature of mid-air haptics by rendering subtle sensations on the palm during meditation, using one design derived from pilot testing. In a novel and exploratory between-subjects study, we compare audio versus audio-haptic guidance in adult novices’ mindfulness meditation, through a mixed methods approach which combines standardised questionnaires with micro-phenomenological interviews ( n =10 per group). Interestingly, mid-air haptics quantitatively increased both hindrance and relaxation, which appears conflicting but is actually complementary when considered together with qualitative analysis. Specifically, mid-air haptics initially distracted participants but eventually facilitated mindfulness through three processes (embodied metaphor, breath alignment, and meditative grounding), though this requires further validation. We reflect on the need for future work exploring an integrated, multimodal meditation experience. • Mid-air haptics was initially distracting but eventually facilitated mindfulness. • Flexibility of mid-air haptics addresses novices’ differing meditation abilities. • Mixed methods approaches are crucial in studying technology-assisted meditation.

International Journal of Human-Computer StudiesVol. 201
Mathematical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University College London (GB), Bedford College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
5.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.