Can a Divinely Guided World Include Blind Chance?

Compatibilism, or accommodationism, is the view that evolutionary theory and interventionist theism are compatible. According to compatibilists, God can guide the biosphere while allowing for chance events. A key challenge for compatibilists is to explain how blind and aimless chance events together can build a guided biosphere. This article aims to address this challenge. We discuss three candidate models designed to show the compatibility of chance and being guided: the Bartholomew-Bradley model, the van Inwagen model, and the Polkinghorne model. First, we argue that the Bartholomew-Bradley model fails to demonstrate the compatibility of blind chance and being guided; it only shows that chance is compatible with statistical orders. However, it is not clear that being regulated and supervised through statistical orders is the proper articulation of the world being divinely guided. Second, the van Inwagen model demonstrates that being guided is compatible with geometrically constrained chance but not mere chance. This model only shows that chance and being guided can be compatible if some form of constraint is present. And third, although the Polkinghorne model successfully shows the compatibility of chance and being guided, it faces its own challenges; it leaves some notions unexplained and controversy over naturalism untouched. A naturalist can use the core of this model without being convinced of the role of divine guidance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zygon®
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.17237
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can a Divinely Guided World Include Blind Chance?

1 citations
Zygon®
Intellectual Property Law
15.98
article

Can a Divinely Guided World Include Blind Chance?

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Compatibilism, or accommodationism, is the view that evolutionary theory and interventionist theism are compatible. According to compatibilists, God can guide the biosphere while allowing for chance events. A key challenge for compatibilists is to explain how blind and aimless chance events together can build a guided biosphere. This article aims to address this challenge. We discuss three candidate models designed to show the compatibility of chance and being guided: the Bartholomew-Bradley model, the van Inwagen model, and the Polkinghorne model. First, we argue that the Bartholomew-Bradley model fails to demonstrate the compatibility of blind chance and being guided; it only shows that chance is compatible with statistical orders. However, it is not clear that being regulated and supervised through statistical orders is the proper articulation of the world being divinely guided. Second, the van Inwagen model demonstrates that being guided is compatible with geometrically constrained chance but not mere chance. This model only shows that chance and being guided can be compatible if some form of constraint is present. And third, although the Polkinghorne model successfully shows the compatibility of chance and being guided, it faces its own challenges; it leaves some notions unexplained and controversy over naturalism untouched. A naturalist can use the core of this model without being convinced of the role of divine guidance.

Zygon®Vol. 60(3)
Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Intellectual Property Law
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.