Internationalizing Philosophy of Education: The Vexing (Liberating) Problem of Language

Abstract: As the philosophy of music education further internationalizes with Asian philosophies in recent years, the problem of language is a crucial issue that can no longer be ignored. When mining ideas originally written in non-English languages, is it possible to truly know what was said or written? Is knowledge of the original language necessary? When interpreting and quoting non-English philosophical texts, what does it mean to do philosophy with integrity and in a philosophically responsible manner? These questions resist simple answers. To this end, I delimit this paper to three central themes: doubt, rigor, and humility, which offer implications for publications, leadership, and gatekeeping in our field as it continues to internationalize. While I draw examples primarily from the vexing problem of interpreting and presenting Chinese philosophical texts to English readers, the ideas offered may also be applied to work involving texts in other non-English languages. I conclude by arguing that while vexing, the problem of language is simultaneously liberating—one that expands the limits of our worlds for the melioration of music education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Music Education Review
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2979/pme.00022
Primary Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Internationalizing Philosophy of Education: The Vexing (Liberating) Problem of Language

Leonard Tan
Philosophy of Music Education Review
Religious Education and Schools
article

Internationalizing Philosophy of Education: The Vexing (Liberating) Problem of Language

Leonard Tan
article en

Abstract

Abstract: As the philosophy of music education further internationalizes with Asian philosophies in recent years, the problem of language is a crucial issue that can no longer be ignored. When mining ideas originally written in non-English languages, is it possible to truly know what was said or written? Is knowledge of the original language necessary? When interpreting and quoting non-English philosophical texts, what does it mean to do philosophy with integrity and in a philosophically responsible manner? These questions resist simple answers. To this end, I delimit this paper to three central themes: doubt, rigor, and humility, which offer implications for publications, leadership, and gatekeeping in our field as it continues to internationalize. While I draw examples primarily from the vexing problem of interpreting and presenting Chinese philosophical texts to English readers, the ideas offered may also be applied to work involving texts in other non-English languages. I conclude by arguing that while vexing, the problem of language is simultaneously liberating—one that expands the limits of our worlds for the melioration of music education.

Philosophy of Music Education ReviewVol. 33(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Religious Education and Schools
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.