A Framework for Assessing the Habitat Correlates of Spatially Explicit Population Trends

ABSTRACT Aim Halting widespread biodiversity loss will require detailed information on species' trends and the habitat conditions correlated with population declines. However, constraints on conventional monitoring programs and commonplace approaches for trend estimation can make it difficult to obtain such information across species' ranges. Here, we demonstrate how recent developments in machine learning and model interpretation, combined with data sources derived from participatory science, enable landscape‐scale inferences on the habitat correlates of population trends across broad spatial extents. Location Worldwide, with a case study in the western United States. Methods We used interpretable machine learning to understand the relationships between land cover and spatially explicit bird population trends. Using a case study with three passerine birds in the western U.S. and spatially explicit trends derived from eBird data, we explore the potential impacts of simulated land cover modification while evaluating potential co‐benefits among species. Results Our analysis revealed complex, non‐linear relationships between land cover variables and species' population trends as well as substantial interspecific variation in those relationships. Areas with the most positive impacts from a simulated land cover modification overlapped for two species, but these changes had little effect on the third species. Main Conclusions This framework can help conservation practitioners identify important relationships between species trends and habitat while also highlighting areas where potential modifications to the landscape could bring the biggest benefits. The analysis is transferable to hundreds of species worldwide with spatially explicit trend estimates, allowing inference across multiple species at scales that are tractable for management to combat species declines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity and Distributions
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.70030
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework for Assessing the Habitat Correlates of Spatially Explicit Population Trends

Courtney L. Davis, Amanda D. Rodewald, Matthew Strimas‐Mackey, Shawn Ligocki et al.
2 citations
Diversity and Distributions
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
article

A Framework for Assessing the Habitat Correlates of Spatially Explicit Population Trends

Courtney L. Davis, Amanda D. Rodewald, Matthew Strimas‐Mackey, Shawn Ligocki, Viviana Ruiz‐Gutiérrez, Tom Auer, Andrew N. Stillman, Kylee D. Dunham, Daniel Fink, Alison Johnston
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Halting widespread biodiversity loss will require detailed information on species' trends and the habitat conditions correlated with population declines. However, constraints on conventional monitoring programs and commonplace approaches for trend estimation can make it difficult to obtain such information across species' ranges. Here, we demonstrate how recent developments in machine learning and model interpretation, combined with data sources derived from participatory science, enable landscape‐scale inferences on the habitat correlates of population trends across broad spatial extents. Location Worldwide, with a case study in the western United States. Methods We used interpretable machine learning to understand the relationships between land cover and spatially explicit bird population trends. Using a case study with three passerine birds in the western U.S. and spatially explicit trends derived from eBird data, we explore the potential impacts of simulated land cover modification while evaluating potential co‐benefits among species. Results Our analysis revealed complex, non‐linear relationships between land cover variables and species' population trends as well as substantial interspecific variation in those relationships. Areas with the most positive impacts from a simulated land cover modification overlapped for two species, but these changes had little effect on the third species. Main Conclusions This framework can help conservation practitioners identify important relationships between species trends and habitat while also highlighting areas where potential modifications to the landscape could bring the biggest benefits. The analysis is transferable to hundreds of species worldwide with spatially explicit trend estimates, allowing inference across multiple species at scales that are tractable for management to combat species declines.

Diversity and DistributionsVol. 31(5)
Atkins (United States) (US), University of St Andrews (GB), Cornell University (US), Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (US)
National Science Foundation, Purdue University, Leon Levy Foundation, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.