The European Small Claims Procedure and the future of EU-wide procedural instruments

Recent data shows that multiple EU Member States do not offer a simplified, effective, and harmonized procedure for domestic small claims. This data also shows that the European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP) and other European procedural instruments are not being widely used by litigants in Member States. In light of these developments, this paper argues that the EU legislature should extend the ESCP to domestic small claims in all Member States in addition to cross-boarder small claims. This expansion will have several advantages, including the protection of litigants’ access to justice, the harmonisation of small claims procedure across the EU, and the increased popularity of the ESCP amongst legal professionals. The paper also argues that extending the ESCP to domestic claims is a balanced and limited solution, and it does not violate the procedural autonomy of Member States, nor the fundamental principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Ítalo-española de Derecho procesal
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2908
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Small Claims Procedure and the future of EU-wide procedural instruments

Nicolas Kyriakides
1 links
Revista Ítalo-española de Derecho procesal
European and International Law Studies
article

The European Small Claims Procedure and the future of EU-wide procedural instruments

Nicolas Kyriakides
article en

Abstract

Recent data shows that multiple EU Member States do not offer a simplified, effective, and harmonized procedure for domestic small claims. This data also shows that the European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP) and other European procedural instruments are not being widely used by litigants in Member States. In light of these developments, this paper argues that the EU legislature should extend the ESCP to domestic small claims in all Member States in addition to cross-boarder small claims. This expansion will have several advantages, including the protection of litigants’ access to justice, the harmonisation of small claims procedure across the EU, and the increased popularity of the ESCP amongst legal professionals. The paper also argues that extending the ESCP to domestic claims is a balanced and limited solution, and it does not violate the procedural autonomy of Member States, nor the fundamental principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.

Revista Ítalo-española de Derecho procesal
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.