Pricing Chooser Option

With the rapid development of financial markets and the increasing diversification of investment instruments and choices, exotic derivatives like the Chooser option have emerged. This special type of option contract grants holders the right to choose whether the option is a put or a call at the selection date. This flexibility facilitates investors' hedging policies and diversification to spread risk and enhance returns. However, pricing it appropriately becomes a difficult task because of its complexity. This paper first aims to price the Chooser option in two ways: the N-period Binomial tree model and the Black-Scholes model combined with Monte Carlo simulations. Then, the results from both approaches are compared and it is found that the outcomes are approximately equivalent when the parameters are held constant. Building on this finding, the computational efficiency of both methods in Python is analyzed, with fixing N (period) at 100. The results indicate that the running time of the Black-Scholes model exceeds that of the N-period Binomial tree model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Natural Science
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/2025.22645
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pricing Chooser Option

Ming Ding, Yang Wu, Jiaxin Liu
Theoretical and Natural Science
Economic theories and models
article

Pricing Chooser Option

Ming Ding, Yang Wu, Jiaxin Liu
article en

Abstract

With the rapid development of financial markets and the increasing diversification of investment instruments and choices, exotic derivatives like the Chooser option have emerged. This special type of option contract grants holders the right to choose whether the option is a put or a call at the selection date. This flexibility facilitates investors' hedging policies and diversification to spread risk and enhance returns. However, pricing it appropriately becomes a difficult task because of its complexity. This paper first aims to price the Chooser option in two ways: the N-period Binomial tree model and the Black-Scholes model combined with Monte Carlo simulations. Then, the results from both approaches are compared and it is found that the outcomes are approximately equivalent when the parameters are held constant. Building on this finding, the computational efficiency of both methods in Python is analyzed, with fixing N (period) at 100. The results indicate that the running time of the Black-Scholes model exceeds that of the N-period Binomial tree model.

Theoretical and Natural ScienceVol. 107(1)
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN), Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Shenzhen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Economic theories and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pricing Chooser Option — Ming Ding, Yang Wu, et al. · Theoretical and Natural Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS