The International Trauma Interview (ITI): development of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and evaluation in a UK sample

<b>Background:</b> The International Trauma Interview (ITI) is a structured clinician-administered measure developed to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as defined in the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study aimed to investigate a psychometric evaluation of the ITI and to finalise the English language version.<b>Method:</b> The latent structure, internal consistency, interrater agreement, and convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated with data from a convenience sample, drawn from an existing research cohort, of 131 trauma exposed participants from the United Kingdom reporting past diagnosis for PTSD or who had screened positively for traumatic stress symptoms. A range of self-report measures evaluating depression, panic, insomnia, dissociation, emotion dysregulation, negative cognitions about self, interpersonal functioning and general wellbeing were completed.<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported an adjusted second-order two-factor model of PTSD and disturbances in self-organisation (DSO) symptoms, allowing affect dysregulation to also load onto the PTSD factor, over alternative models. The ITI scores showed acceptable internal consistency, and interrater reliability was strong. Findings for convergent and discriminant validity were mostly as predicted for PTSD and DSO domains. Correlations with the ITQ were good but coefficients for the level of agreement of PTSD diagnosis and CPTSD diagnosis between the ITI and the ITQ were weaker, and item level agreement was variable.<b>Conclusion:</b> Results provide support for the reliability and validity of the ITI as a measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD. Final revisions of the ITI are described.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2494361
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The International Trauma Interview (ITI): development of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and evaluation in a UK sample

Mark Shevlin, Catrin Lewis, Kristina Bondjers, Marylène Cloître et al.
8 citations
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Migration, Health and Trauma
18.45
article

The International Trauma Interview (ITI): development of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and evaluation in a UK sample

Mark Shevlin, Catrin Lewis, Kristina Bondjers, Marylène Cloître, Thanos Karatzias, Philip Hyland, Robert Fox, Neil P. Roberts, Odeta Geležėlytė, Chris R. Brewin, Alistair J. Souch, Jonathan I. Bisson, Andrés Fresno, A. Roberts
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The International Trauma Interview (ITI) is a structured clinician-administered measure developed to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as defined in the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study aimed to investigate a psychometric evaluation of the ITI and to finalise the English language version.<b>Method:</b> The latent structure, internal consistency, interrater agreement, and convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated with data from a convenience sample, drawn from an existing research cohort, of 131 trauma exposed participants from the United Kingdom reporting past diagnosis for PTSD or who had screened positively for traumatic stress symptoms. A range of self-report measures evaluating depression, panic, insomnia, dissociation, emotion dysregulation, negative cognitions about self, interpersonal functioning and general wellbeing were completed.<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported an adjusted second-order two-factor model of PTSD and disturbances in self-organisation (DSO) symptoms, allowing affect dysregulation to also load onto the PTSD factor, over alternative models. The ITI scores showed acceptable internal consistency, and interrater reliability was strong. Findings for convergent and discriminant validity were mostly as predicted for PTSD and DSO domains. Correlations with the ITQ were good but coefficients for the level of agreement of PTSD diagnosis and CPTSD diagnosis between the ITI and the ITQ were weaker, and item level agreement was variable.<b>Conclusion:</b> Results provide support for the reliability and validity of the ITI as a measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD. Final revisions of the ITI are described.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 16(1)
National College of Ireland (IE), Uppsala University (SE), Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB), NHS Lothian (GB), University of Talca (CL), University of Ulster (GB), National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), Vilnius University (LT), Palo Alto University (US), National Institute of Disaster Management (IN), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), National Center for PTSD (US), Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NO), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology (CZ), University College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Migration, Health and Trauma
18.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.