Spencer Technique of the Hip Demonstrates Equivocal Changes in Hip Range of Motion

Context Hip range of motion plays a crucial role in the functional health of runners. Osteopathic manipulative treatment has historically been used to maintain or restore a joint's range of motion; therefore, this study investigates how the Spencer technique impacts femoroacetabular active range of motion in runners. Objective This study investigated the impact that the bilateral Spencer technique has on all planes of hip motion. Methods Forty participants were randomly divided into treatment and control groups, with the treatment group receiving twice-weekly bilateral Spencer technique for four weeks and the control group receiving no treatment. Both groups were instructed to train as they normally would for the four weeks leading up to a five-kilometer (5K) race. Measurements of hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction were taken to assess the percent change in range of motion over the course of training, as well as before and after the race, for all planes of motion in treatment vs control groups. Results The only significant difference in average percent change in range of motion for control (n=19) vs treatment groups (n=20) across both treatment and race periods was found for abduction wherein the control group experienced an average change of +7.09% (standard deviation of 17.38%) and the treatment group experienced an average change of -5.58% (standard deviation of 17.48%) for a difference of 12.67% (p=0.03). All other findings for all other motions across both training and race periods showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion This study found that four weeks of twice-weekly treatment with the Spencer technique of the hip had no statistically significant impact on change in hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction across the four weeks when compared to control. When analyzing the impact of this treatment on the change of these motions across a 5K race occurring at the end of the four weeks, this study found that the Spencer technique of the hip had a statistically significant negative impact on abduction, compared to the control. These findings bring into question the role that the Spencer technique of the hip may have for healthy individuals training for athletic competition and open the door for future research to analyze the effect that this osteopathic technique has on motion in a setting that better controls for differences in training habits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.83560
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spencer Technique of the Hip Demonstrates Equivocal Changes in Hip Range of Motion

James Toldi, Barbara A. Bushman, David Boesler, Vincent R Savarino et al.
2 citations
Cureus
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
4.01
article

Spencer Technique of the Hip Demonstrates Equivocal Changes in Hip Range of Motion

James Toldi, Barbara A. Bushman, David Boesler, Vincent R Savarino, Jason S DeFrancisis, RJ Steiner, Zachary J Buchman, Benjamin M Vinarski, Jesse T O'Rorke, Cameron S Guay
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Context Hip range of motion plays a crucial role in the functional health of runners. Osteopathic manipulative treatment has historically been used to maintain or restore a joint's range of motion; therefore, this study investigates how the Spencer technique impacts femoroacetabular active range of motion in runners. Objective This study investigated the impact that the bilateral Spencer technique has on all planes of hip motion. Methods Forty participants were randomly divided into treatment and control groups, with the treatment group receiving twice-weekly bilateral Spencer technique for four weeks and the control group receiving no treatment. Both groups were instructed to train as they normally would for the four weeks leading up to a five-kilometer (5K) race. Measurements of hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction were taken to assess the percent change in range of motion over the course of training, as well as before and after the race, for all planes of motion in treatment vs control groups. Results The only significant difference in average percent change in range of motion for control (n=19) vs treatment groups (n=20) across both treatment and race periods was found for abduction wherein the control group experienced an average change of +7.09% (standard deviation of 17.38%) and the treatment group experienced an average change of -5.58% (standard deviation of 17.48%) for a difference of 12.67% (p=0.03). All other findings for all other motions across both training and race periods showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion This study found that four weeks of twice-weekly treatment with the Spencer technique of the hip had no statistically significant impact on change in hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction across the four weeks when compared to control. When analyzing the impact of this treatment on the change of these motions across a 5K race occurring at the end of the four weeks, this study found that the Spencer technique of the hip had a statistically significant negative impact on abduction, compared to the control. These findings bring into question the role that the Spencer technique of the hip may have for healthy individuals training for athletic competition and open the door for future research to analyze the effect that this osteopathic technique has on motion in a setting that better controls for differences in training habits.

CureusVol. 17(5)
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.