Detection of Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence from PET/CT Scans Using Deep Learning

<b>Background:</b> Prostate cancer (PC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. PSMA-directed positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promising results in detecting recurrent PC and metastasis, improving the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment planning. To evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) model based on [<sup>18</sup>F]-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 PET datasets for the detection of local recurrence in patients with prostate cancer. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 1404 [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007 PET/CTs from patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Artificial neural networks were trained to recognize the presence of local recurrence based on the PET data. First, the hyperparameters were optimized for an initial model (model A). Subsequently, the bladder was localized using an already published model and a model (model B) was trained only on a 20 cm cube around the bladder. Finally, two separate models were trained on the same section depending on the prostatectomy status (model C (post-prostatectomy) and model D (non-operated)). <b>Results:</b> Model A achieved an accuracy of 56% on the validation data. By restricting the region to the area around the bladder, Model B achieved a validation accuracy of 71%. When validating the specialized models according to prostatectomy status, model C achieved an accuracy of 77% and model D an accuracy of 77%. All models achieved accuracies of almost 100% on the training data, indicating overfitting. <b>Conclusions:</b> For the presented task, 1404 examinations were insufficient to reach an accuracy of over 90% even when employing data augmentation, including additional metadata and performing automated hyperparameter optimization. The low F1-score and AUC values indicate that none of the presented models produce reliable results. However, we will facilitate future research and the development of better models by openly sharing our source code and all pre-trained models for transfer learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091575
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence from PET/CT Scans Using Deep Learning

Robin Dirk, Markus J. Ankenbrand, Aleksander Kosmala, Philipp E. Hartrampf et al.
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Detection of Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence from PET/CT Scans Using Deep Learning

Robin Dirk, Markus J. Ankenbrand, Aleksander Kosmala, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas K. Buck, Sebastian E. Serfling, Rudolf Alexander Werner, Hülya Efetürk, Kerstin Michalski, Wiebke Schloetelburg, Melissa L. Korb, Tim Jedamzik
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Prostate cancer (PC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. PSMA-directed positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promising results in detecting recurrent PC and metastasis, improving the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment planning. To evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) model based on [<sup>18</sup>F]-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 PET datasets for the detection of local recurrence in patients with prostate cancer. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 1404 [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007 PET/CTs from patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Artificial neural networks were trained to recognize the presence of local recurrence based on the PET data. First, the hyperparameters were optimized for an initial model (model A). Subsequently, the bladder was localized using an already published model and a model (model B) was trained only on a 20 cm cube around the bladder. Finally, two separate models were trained on the same section depending on the prostatectomy status (model C (post-prostatectomy) and model D (non-operated)). <b>Results:</b> Model A achieved an accuracy of 56% on the validation data. By restricting the region to the area around the bladder, Model B achieved a validation accuracy of 71%. When validating the specialized models according to prostatectomy status, model C achieved an accuracy of 77% and model D an accuracy of 77%. All models achieved accuracies of almost 100% on the training data, indicating overfitting. <b>Conclusions:</b> For the presented task, 1404 examinations were insufficient to reach an accuracy of over 90% even when employing data augmentation, including additional metadata and performing automated hyperparameter optimization. The low F1-score and AUC values indicate that none of the presented models produce reliable results. However, we will facilitate future research and the development of better models by openly sharing our source code and all pre-trained models for transfer learning.

CancersVol. 17(9)
University of Würzburg (DE), Nicosia General Hospital (CY), LMU Klinikum (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.