Deinstitutionalisation in Latvia: Insights from Care Leavers’ Perspectives

This article contributes to the ongoing debate on the deinstitutionalisation of children’s care homes, a subject recently explored in this journal. The findings provide fresh perspectives on the dominant view that group care settings are inherently harmful to children. Through narrative interviews, stories were collected from 19 young adults who had been in orphanage care in Latvia. The findings from these interviews challenge prevailing professional opinions on the experiences and perceptions of group care. Participants shared accounts of their time in care and, in some cases, how they discovered a sense of home for the first time. While this study did not set out to compare different care settings or investigate foster care specifically, reflections on these comparisons emerged from the data. To meet the demands of policy, often reflecting the perspectives of global NGOs, Latvia, like many former Soviet Bloc countries has closed its orphanages and repackaged them under different terminology, such as Youth Rehabilitation Centres. It has also turned to foster care and smaller group settings. The insights from Latvian care leavers offer a vital counterpoint in a context where the advantages of deinstitutionalization and the preference for foster care are often assumed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Practice
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2025.2489052
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deinstitutionalisation in Latvia: Insights from Care Leavers’ Perspectives

Zoë Kessler, S. Levy, Mark Smith
1 links
Practice
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Deinstitutionalisation in Latvia: Insights from Care Leavers’ Perspectives

Zoë Kessler, S. Levy, Mark Smith
article en

Abstract

This article contributes to the ongoing debate on the deinstitutionalisation of children’s care homes, a subject recently explored in this journal. The findings provide fresh perspectives on the dominant view that group care settings are inherently harmful to children. Through narrative interviews, stories were collected from 19 young adults who had been in orphanage care in Latvia. The findings from these interviews challenge prevailing professional opinions on the experiences and perceptions of group care. Participants shared accounts of their time in care and, in some cases, how they discovered a sense of home for the first time. While this study did not set out to compare different care settings or investigate foster care specifically, reflections on these comparisons emerged from the data. To meet the demands of policy, often reflecting the perspectives of global NGOs, Latvia, like many former Soviet Bloc countries has closed its orphanages and repackaged them under different terminology, such as Youth Rehabilitation Centres. It has also turned to foster care and smaller group settings. The insights from Latvian care leavers offer a vital counterpoint in a context where the advantages of deinstitutionalization and the preference for foster care are often assumed.

PracticeVol. 37(5)
Twitter (United States) (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deinstitutionalisation in Latvia: Insights from Care Leavers’ Perspectives — Zoë Kessler, S. Levy, et al. · Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS