Carbon incentives and farm economics: A study of peatland drainage optimization

Natural, waterlogged peatlands are recognized as the most efficient carbon storage ecosystems, playing a critical role in climate regulation. However, in Europe, agriculture on drained peat soils — although comprising only 2.5 % of the agricultural area — contributes disproportionately, generating approximately 25 % of the EU’s total agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. This study examines the potential of drainage optimization and rewetting as strategies to reduce emissions from peatlands while balancing agricultural productivity. We quantitatively analyse the production, land use, and economic implications for farmers in two different farm scenarios using economic modelling and dynamic optimization. Our analysis evaluates the impact of carbon subsidy pricing on crop diversity and farmer income. Results indicate that while carbon subsidy prices have minimal influence on crop rotation diversity, they significantly affect farmers' income. With a subsidy price of 30€ per ton of CO 2 equivalent, or 80€ per ton in the case of high-value crops, farmers transition into "carbon farmers", obtaining higher share of total net present value from carbon subsidies rather than traditional agricultural income. Furthermore, the majority of climate benefits, including GHG reduction, are realized already at the 30€/tCO 2 e subsidy threshold. The findings suggest that carbon subsidies could offer a viable financial incentive for farmers to adopt peatland rewetting practices, which could reduce GHG emissions substantially. However, subsidy designs need careful calibration to ensure they do not distort agricultural practices or reduce crop diversity, while still delivering significant climate benefits. • Carbon subsidy prices have minimal influence on crop rotation diversity. • Optimal drainage is affected by carbon pricing and irrigation yield benefits. • The majority of climate benefits are realized at the 30€/tCO 2 e subsidy level. • Farmers can turn into "carbon farmers": most of NPV from carbon subsidies. • Carbon subsidies can offer a viable incentive to adopt rewetting practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109512
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon incentives and farm economics: A study of peatland drainage optimization

Domna Tzemi, Janne Rämö, Antti Miettinen, Heikki Lehtonen et al.
1 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
article

Carbon incentives and farm economics: A study of peatland drainage optimization

Domna Tzemi, Janne Rämö, Antti Miettinen, Heikki Lehtonen, Henrik Wejberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Natural, waterlogged peatlands are recognized as the most efficient carbon storage ecosystems, playing a critical role in climate regulation. However, in Europe, agriculture on drained peat soils — although comprising only 2.5 % of the agricultural area — contributes disproportionately, generating approximately 25 % of the EU’s total agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. This study examines the potential of drainage optimization and rewetting as strategies to reduce emissions from peatlands while balancing agricultural productivity. We quantitatively analyse the production, land use, and economic implications for farmers in two different farm scenarios using economic modelling and dynamic optimization. Our analysis evaluates the impact of carbon subsidy pricing on crop diversity and farmer income. Results indicate that while carbon subsidy prices have minimal influence on crop rotation diversity, they significantly affect farmers' income. With a subsidy price of 30€ per ton of CO 2 equivalent, or 80€ per ton in the case of high-value crops, farmers transition into "carbon farmers", obtaining higher share of total net present value from carbon subsidies rather than traditional agricultural income. Furthermore, the majority of climate benefits, including GHG reduction, are realized already at the 30€/tCO 2 e subsidy threshold. The findings suggest that carbon subsidies could offer a viable financial incentive for farmers to adopt peatland rewetting practices, which could reduce GHG emissions substantially. However, subsidy designs need careful calibration to ensure they do not distort agricultural practices or reduce crop diversity, while still delivering significant climate benefits. • Carbon subsidy prices have minimal influence on crop rotation diversity. • Optimal drainage is affected by carbon pricing and irrigation yield benefits. • The majority of climate benefits are realized at the 30€/tCO 2 e subsidy level. • Farmers can turn into "carbon farmers": most of NPV from carbon subsidies. • Carbon subsidies can offer a viable incentive to adopt rewetting practices.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 314
Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.