How scary is the risk of automation? Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment

Technological advancements have always shaped labor markets; however, emerging AI innovations like ChatGPT are now putting occupations previously considered "safe" from technological substitution at significant risk of automation. This study examines individuals' willingness to pay to reduce automation risk, using a discrete-choice experiment conducted with nearly 6000 participants. Results reveal that respondents accept a salary reduction of almost 20 % of the Swiss median annual gross wage to reduce their automation risk by 10 percentage points or, conversely, demand a 20 % risk premium to accept an equivalent increase in automation risk. Interestingly, the study finds that WTP for risk reduction increases with higher baseline automation risk levels, contrary to patterns observed in other contexts. While preferences are generally homogeneous, differences exist between demographic groups. Men, younger and risk-tolerant individuals, and those with higher education show lower willingness to pay for reduced automation risk. By having respondents express preferences for hypothetical children, the study also explores potential gender biases, finding no significant differences in willingness to pay for reduced automation risk, educational degrees, hierarchical position, or wage based on the child's gender.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107034
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How scary is the risk of automation? Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment

Stefan C. Wolter, Christian Gschwendt, Maria Alejandra Cattaneo
4 citations
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Economic and Environmental Valuation
12.52
article

How scary is the risk of automation? Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment

Stefan C. Wolter, Christian Gschwendt, Maria Alejandra Cattaneo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Technological advancements have always shaped labor markets; however, emerging AI innovations like ChatGPT are now putting occupations previously considered "safe" from technological substitution at significant risk of automation. This study examines individuals' willingness to pay to reduce automation risk, using a discrete-choice experiment conducted with nearly 6000 participants. Results reveal that respondents accept a salary reduction of almost 20 % of the Swiss median annual gross wage to reduce their automation risk by 10 percentage points or, conversely, demand a 20 % risk premium to accept an equivalent increase in automation risk. Interestingly, the study finds that WTP for risk reduction increases with higher baseline automation risk levels, contrary to patterns observed in other contexts. While preferences are generally homogeneous, differences exist between demographic groups. Men, younger and risk-tolerant individuals, and those with higher education show lower willingness to pay for reduced automation risk. By having respondents express preferences for hypothetical children, the study also explores potential gender biases, finding no significant differences in willingness to pay for reduced automation risk, educational degrees, hierarchical position, or wage based on the child's gender.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 235
University of Bern (CH), FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (CH)
Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
12.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.