A comparative overview of various single-shaft and parallel-flow Brayton cycles developed from turbochargers

• Various parallel-flow and single-shaft gas turbine cycles are compared. • Commercial automotive turbochargers are used as the cycle microturbine(s) • Combustion chamber pressure losses of between 6% and 11% are investigated. • Parallel-flow cycles are better when more cycle components are added. Automotive turbochargers can be used to develop gas turbine cycles; however, turbochargers operate at low pressure ratios where cycle performance is sensitive to the addition of pressure-drop components. Parallel-flow Brayton cycles have been proposed to reduce the effect of pressure losses on cycle performance. This analytical study therefore compares various parallel-flow Brayton cycle configurations to their single-shaft counterparts, considering combustion, recuperation, as well as a concentrated solar power input via a solar dish and an open-cavity tubular receiver to identify where parallel-flow cycles are advantageous. Results show that the main shaft turbocharger choice greatly influences whether a single-shaft or a parallel-flow cycle is more beneficial. In recuperated solar cycles with a 6 % combustion chamber pressure loss, the parallel-flow low-temperature-turbine configuration with the solar receiver before the power turbine (in parallel with the main shaft) can achieve a peak thermal efficiency of 23.5 %, with 3 kW of power output, at a pressure ratio of 1.6. This can be compared with a peak thermal efficiency of 21.8 % at a pressure ratio of 1.75 for its single-shaft counterpart. In recuperated parallel-flow cycles and recuperated solar parallel-flow cycles, thermal efficiency performance improves under increased combustion chamber pressure losses, from 6 % up to 11 %, in contrast to the declining performance of single-shaft cycles. More specifically, at a pressure ratio of 1.8, results show that the parallel-flow low-temperature-turbine configuration can outperform its single-shaft counterpart when combustion chamber pressure losses exceed 8.7 %. The study highlights the potential of parallel-flow Brayton cycles for recuperation and concentrated solar power integration, particularly in low-pressure-ratio systems, offering practical guidance for turbocharger and cycle configuration selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119837
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative overview of various single-shaft and parallel-flow Brayton cycles developed from turbochargers

W.G. Le Roux, C.C. Cockcroft
3 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
2.16
article

A comparative overview of various single-shaft and parallel-flow Brayton cycles developed from turbochargers

W.G. Le Roux, C.C. Cockcroft
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Various parallel-flow and single-shaft gas turbine cycles are compared. • Commercial automotive turbochargers are used as the cycle microturbine(s) • Combustion chamber pressure losses of between 6% and 11% are investigated. • Parallel-flow cycles are better when more cycle components are added. Automotive turbochargers can be used to develop gas turbine cycles; however, turbochargers operate at low pressure ratios where cycle performance is sensitive to the addition of pressure-drop components. Parallel-flow Brayton cycles have been proposed to reduce the effect of pressure losses on cycle performance. This analytical study therefore compares various parallel-flow Brayton cycle configurations to their single-shaft counterparts, considering combustion, recuperation, as well as a concentrated solar power input via a solar dish and an open-cavity tubular receiver to identify where parallel-flow cycles are advantageous. Results show that the main shaft turbocharger choice greatly influences whether a single-shaft or a parallel-flow cycle is more beneficial. In recuperated solar cycles with a 6 % combustion chamber pressure loss, the parallel-flow low-temperature-turbine configuration with the solar receiver before the power turbine (in parallel with the main shaft) can achieve a peak thermal efficiency of 23.5 %, with 3 kW of power output, at a pressure ratio of 1.6. This can be compared with a peak thermal efficiency of 21.8 % at a pressure ratio of 1.75 for its single-shaft counterpart. In recuperated parallel-flow cycles and recuperated solar parallel-flow cycles, thermal efficiency performance improves under increased combustion chamber pressure losses, from 6 % up to 11 %, in contrast to the declining performance of single-shaft cycles. More specifically, at a pressure ratio of 1.8, results show that the parallel-flow low-temperature-turbine configuration can outperform its single-shaft counterpart when combustion chamber pressure losses exceed 8.7 %. The study highlights the potential of parallel-flow Brayton cycles for recuperation and concentrated solar power integration, particularly in low-pressure-ratio systems, offering practical guidance for turbocharger and cycle configuration selection.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 335
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
2.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.