Can transformative experiences bridge the gap between receiving communities and formerly incarcerated persons?
The stigma of incarceration contributes to the global reoffending crisis and remains a barrier to reintegration into receiving communities. Recent research suggests that the key to solving this problem may lie in shared transformative experiences. We tested whether the salience of such experiences can overcome stigma among members of receiving communities when they act as gatekeepers for formerly incarcerated persons seeking employment. Across four experimental studies with seven samples of US and UK nationals (N = 2091), we examined the conditions under which transformative experiences can lead to identity fusion, a powerful form of social bonding and contribute to hiring and optimism about reintegration among prospective employers. In six of seven samples, those who reported stronger transformative experiences of their own were more fused to a job applicant, which was linked to positive attitudes towards them and willingness to hire them. Effects of formerly incarcerated persons' experiences varied between national samples and experience contexts: American citizens were more receptive to experiences in prison, while British citizens were more influenced by sports experiences. These findings highlight the potency of transformative experiences to forge connective bridges to stigmatized groups, despite cultural differences in perceptions of relevant social cues about formerly incarcerated people.
Authors
- Linus Peitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-6968)
- Harvey Whitehouse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-6724)
- Martha Newson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-9562)
Institutions
- University of Kent (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Greenwich (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Published
- 2025-05-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12886
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.20
Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- Templeton Religion Trust
- Economic and Social Research Council