Coherence and the Conjunction Fallacy

The conjunction fallacy occurs when, after reading about an introductory event <i>a</i>, participants rate a combination of two events (<i>b <sub>˄</sub></i> <i>c</i>) as more likely than a single event <i>b</i>. It has been proposed that the fallacy is more likely to occur when the coherence of <i>a, b, c</i>-the extent to which the three events fit together to form a united and complete story-is greater than that of <i>a, b</i>. In the current research, participants were presented with a three-event sequence made to appear coherent or non-coherent. The events were presented in one of three modalities (verbal, physical, and musical) with two studies in each modality. Compared to chance, participants were more likely to commit the fallacy in the coherent condition and less likely to commit the fallacy in the non-coherent condition. Coherence can thus serve as a conduit by which different circumstances can induce the conjunction fallacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251335810
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coherence and the Conjunction Fallacy

Annetta Snell, Miron Zuckerman, Madison Burt
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Coherence and the Conjunction Fallacy

Annetta Snell, Miron Zuckerman, Madison Burt
article en

Abstract

The conjunction fallacy occurs when, after reading about an introductory event <i>a</i>, participants rate a combination of two events (<i>b <sub>˄</sub></i> <i>c</i>) as more likely than a single event <i>b</i>. It has been proposed that the fallacy is more likely to occur when the coherence of <i>a, b, c</i>-the extent to which the three events fit together to form a united and complete story-is greater than that of <i>a, b</i>. In the current research, participants were presented with a three-event sequence made to appear coherent or non-coherent. The events were presented in one of three modalities (verbal, physical, and musical) with two studies in each modality. Compared to chance, participants were more likely to commit the fallacy in the coherent condition and less likely to commit the fallacy in the non-coherent condition. Coherence can thus serve as a conduit by which different circumstances can induce the conjunction fallacy.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of Rochester (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.