“Abort the government!” Alliances between diverse groups and collective action intentions as a response to threat evoked by abortion bans

Recent abortion restrictions in the US and Poland sparked widespread protests. This research examined how personal threat influenced collective action intentions through alliances with men and the LGBTIQ+ community (from women’s perspective), and alliances with women (from men’s perspective). It focused on two representations of intergroup cooperation: recategorization as one group and coalitions between distinct groups. In both countries, higher threat levels were linked to greater collective action intentions. For women, this was mediated by coalitions with men in Poland, but not in the US, while coalition with the LGBTIQ+ community mediated the relationship in both countries. Recategorization as one group mobilized women only in Poland when involving the LGBTIQ+ community. For men, coalitions with women mediated the link between threat and collective action in both countries. The findings suggest that coalitions preserving distinct group identities are more effective in advancing women’s rights than recategorization, especially when involving advantaged allies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251328035
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Abort the government!” Alliances between diverse groups and collective action intentions as a response to threat evoked by abortion bans

Soledad de Lemus, Anna Potoczek, Dominika Gurbisz, Lucía Estevan‐Reina et al.
1 links
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

“Abort the government!” Alliances between diverse groups and collective action intentions as a response to threat evoked by abortion bans

Soledad de Lemus, Anna Potoczek, Dominika Gurbisz, Lucía Estevan‐Reina, Marcin Bukowski, Anna Stafiej
article en

Abstract

Recent abortion restrictions in the US and Poland sparked widespread protests. This research examined how personal threat influenced collective action intentions through alliances with men and the LGBTIQ+ community (from women’s perspective), and alliances with women (from men’s perspective). It focused on two representations of intergroup cooperation: recategorization as one group and coalitions between distinct groups. In both countries, higher threat levels were linked to greater collective action intentions. For women, this was mediated by coalitions with men in Poland, but not in the US, while coalition with the LGBTIQ+ community mediated the relationship in both countries. Recategorization as one group mobilized women only in Poland when involving the LGBTIQ+ community. For men, coalitions with women mediated the link between threat and collective action in both countries. The findings suggest that coalitions preserving distinct group identities are more effective in advancing women’s rights than recategorization, especially when involving advantaged allies.

Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsVol. 28(7)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Universidad de Granada (ES), University of Warsaw (PL)
Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej, Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.