Moral perceptions about environmentalism across ideological groups: Negative moral stereotypes threaten rightists’ moral self and trigger polarization

In five studies conducted in Spain and the US, we tested whether rightists (vs. leftists) were more vulnerable to experiencing a threat to the moral self and were more likely to polarize when faced with negative moral stereotypes about environmentalism. Studies 1a–b established that the moral stereotype held by rightists about leftists regarding environmental issues was more positive than vice versa. Additionally, rightists had a more negative meta-stereotype than vice versa. Studies 2a–2b revealed that exposing participants to negative (vs. neutral) stereotypes about their groups’ morality in environmentalism led rightists (but not leftists) to experience a threat to their moral self-concept and polarized their environmental positions and voting intentions. Study 3 experimentally attenuated moral threats, buffering the effects observed in Study 2b. We conclude that the moral threat posed by negative moral stereotypes is key to understanding the polarization of environmental issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251330990
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral perceptions about environmentalism across ideological groups: Negative moral stereotypes threaten rightists’ moral self and trigger polarization

Saulo Fernández, Cristian Catena‐Fernández
3 citations
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Social and Intergroup Psychology
12.60
article

Moral perceptions about environmentalism across ideological groups: Negative moral stereotypes threaten rightists’ moral self and trigger polarization

Saulo Fernández, Cristian Catena‐Fernández
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In five studies conducted in Spain and the US, we tested whether rightists (vs. leftists) were more vulnerable to experiencing a threat to the moral self and were more likely to polarize when faced with negative moral stereotypes about environmentalism. Studies 1a–b established that the moral stereotype held by rightists about leftists regarding environmental issues was more positive than vice versa. Additionally, rightists had a more negative meta-stereotype than vice versa. Studies 2a–2b revealed that exposing participants to negative (vs. neutral) stereotypes about their groups’ morality in environmentalism led rightists (but not leftists) to experience a threat to their moral self-concept and polarized their environmental positions and voting intentions. Study 3 experimentally attenuated moral threats, buffering the effects observed in Study 2b. We conclude that the moral threat posed by negative moral stereotypes is key to understanding the polarization of environmental issues.

Group Processes & Intergroup RelationsVol. 28(7)
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.